9 Jan
2011
9 Jan
'11
2:34 a.m.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Robert Xu <robxu9(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:58, Kristopher Gamrat
<pikidalto(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
the
It has some interesting features, though I haven't had the perception that
it is significantly better - I may be wrong but my initial impression wasn't
great.
Best regards
2011/1/7 Ilya Chernykh <neptunia(a)mail.ru>
>
> Also true. Still, I find it that the whole departure to Dolphin in KDE4
> was far from ideal still. Profile handling well would be better.
>
>
> No doubt. Dolphin is completely unusable. There are just some errors in
> profile handling scripts which should be fixed. Also I noticed that many
> errors were introduced in KDE3 in final versions such as 3.5.10 while
were
absent
previously. Seems like a marketing move to justify scrapping it.
What errors are these errors? I haven't used Dolphin extensively, but in
few times I did use it I did not notice any
problems.
Sorry, I'm going to give in to the KDE 4.6 RC.
Dolphin seems to be working much better. (I actually got impressed,
which is... amazing.)
Konqueror, on the other hand, is still a piece of crap. (why don't
they just make rekonq the default and kill konqueror...)
Truthfully, I'm using Dolphin for KDE3 (D3olphin,
I think it's called)
because Konqueror is making me pull hair.
but I'm wondering if maybe there could be a ReKonq for kde3? lol.
Either that, or we'll wait for tQT to mature for Qt4.
--
later, Robert Xu