I have experience with c++ and qt3, but creating patches and sending them by
mail is a pain in the ass. I would sugest gitorious, wich have "merge
requests", if you dont wanna give commit permisions to all the people who
could help.
El 04/03/2011 20:21, "Ilya Chernykh" <neptunia(a)mail.ru> escribió:
On Friday 04 March 2011 21:20:12 Darrell Anderson wrote:
> When are bugs going to receive attention...
Do you have a list of bugs that were introduced in Trinity and were not
present in KDE 3.5.10?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trini...
Guys,
This issue with missing icons and no desktop -> panel kcontol settings seems
to be limited to one box. I have taken the same packages and installed them on
another box and i686 looks fine. But, "what is messed up on this box?"
I have tried the old tricks.
- kbuildsycoca --noincremental
- creating new user and logging in as him (no luck)
- I have downgraded and tested -> same issue
I did manager to get a kicker.kcrash trying to add an app to kicker that might
help and I have it attached.
Let me know what you think.
P.S. - I would have just attached this in a reply, but my first thread hasn't
come through the mailing list yet. Strange - that was over and hour and twenty
minutes ago?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Hi all,
Just tried installing Trinity in Debian and I'm getting connection timouts
on both the keyserver and the ppa server. Problems?
Best regards,
Tiago
Guys,
Just a note. After going through nightmares early on with kdelibs and kdebase
pulling in Qt4 files, I have gotten trinity to build fine with Qt4 installed on
arch. I'm not sure what has changed. Whether there were updates to cmake files
that helped or whether it was not having kde4 installed that makes the
difference. However, with Qt4 installed, I can now build trinity without conflicts.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
In Konqueror, if you type the url "about:konqueror", you get a menu
with "Home folder", "Storage media"... and "About Kubuntu". Since we
have packages for several distros, this should be removed from Trinity
sources
Albert Vaca
David,
You have to build the whole package, or you need to use cmake -DBUILD_KRULER=ON if you wanna build kruler by itself
Calvin
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
>Guys,
>
> Here are the errors I'm getting with kdegraphics kruler and kview. I know they
>are both recently ported (or may be still in the process). So question (1) is:
>"should they be considered ready to build?" Question (2), "do I build them both
>independently or do I have to build the whole kdegraphics package at once?"
>
>
> If so (or regardless), here are the errors:
>
>trinity-kdegraphics-kruler:
>
>-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
>-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
>CMake Error at pics/CMakeLists.txt:16 (tde_install_icons):
> Unknown CMake command "tde_install_icons".
>
>
>trinity-kdegraphics-kview:
>
>-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
>CMake Error at kimageviewer/CMakeLists.txt:25 (install):
> install FILES given no DESTINATION!
>
>CMake Error at kimageviewer/CMakeLists.txt:32 (tde_add_library):
> Unknown CMake command "tde_add_library".
>
>
> So does this just tell me - they ain't ready yet?
>
>--
>David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
>Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>
Guys,
Sorry I forgot to post this, but I'd sent it from an account that wasn't on
the trinity-devel list and it got bounced. amarok/src/osd.h has a constructor
that needs fixing:
--- amarok/src/osd.h
+++ amarok/src/osd.h 2011-02-26 14:45:04.000000000 -0600
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
public slots:
/** calls setText() then show(), after setting image if needed */
- void show( const TQString &text, TQImage newImage = TQImage::TQImage() );
+ void show( const TQString &text, TQImage newImage = TQImage() );
void ratingChanged( const short rating );
void ratingChanged( const TQString& path, int rating );
void volChanged( unsigned char volume );
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Timothy Pearson
> <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net
>> wrote:
>
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > Here is just a thought. How do you want to handle links in the
>> current
>> > code to
>> > "kde.org"? I have seen several already in the "tips" window, like: "If
>> you
>> > would
>> > like to contribute your own tip of the day, go to ....kde.org"
>> >
>> > Generically, I'm sure there are more in "help", etc. that refer to
>> > kde.org
>> > links intended for kde3 that are no longer there.
>> >
>> > Do we want to try and do anything with them?
>> >
>>
>> Yes we do. We should probably have a tip submission system, but I think I
>> may wait for the new website. Off the top of my head I'd put it at
http://tips.trinitydesktop.org, but I don't own that domain yet.
>>
>>
> You do now :)
Yes :) I got to thinking that I didn't want some automated domain
purchaser snatching it for resale because it was mentioned on a public
website (the mailing list and IRC logs). I won't be activating it until
the new website is complete (hopefully soon!).
Tim
Guys,
Here is just a thought. How do you want to handle links in the current code to
"kde.org"? I have seen several already in the "tips" window, like: "If you would
like to contribute your own tip of the day, go to ....kde.org"
Generically, I'm sure there are more in "help", etc. that refer to kde.org
links intended for kde3 that are no longer there.
Do we want to try and do anything with them?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Tim,
I went to register for the bugzilla and found that the confirmation request
from 74.84.118.181 was rejected by postfix because 74.84.118.181 does not
provide a proper reverse lookup causing:
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_unknown_client
It is 'reject_unknown_client' causing the rejection. From:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html the rejection is caused when:
1) the client IP address->name mapping fails, 2) the name->address mapping
fails, or 3) the name->address mapping does not match the client IP address.
I'm no postfix expert, but to let the confirmation through, I just removed
'reject_unknown_client'. If there have been people who don't get the
confirmation emails, this may one reason why :)
The actual postfix rejection was:
Feb 28 16:22:21 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: warning: 74.84.118.181: address not
listed for hostname pearsoncomputing.net
Feb 28 16:22:21 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: connect from unknown[74.84.118.181]
Feb 28 16:22:22 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[74.84.118.181]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
hostname, [74.84.118.181]; from=<bugs(a)pearsoncomputing.net> to=<snip>
proto=ESMTP helo=<vali.starlink.edu>
Feb 28 16:22:22 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: disconnect from unknown[74.84.118.181]
Somebody smart with postfix and bind can probably tell you what the exact
issue is. Just looking, I see a helo from vali.starlink.edu and the "warning:
74.84.118.181: address not listed for hostname pearsoncomputing.net"
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.