19 Oct
2014
19 Oct
'14
4:25 p.m.
On Monday 20 of October 2014 01:05:57 Alexandre wrote:
Hi,
Visually, I have no problem with either using the provided false shadow or
the CSS3 one. What it does when it is displayed in Konq-error? Does it make
Konq go crazy or it is just not shown.
On the other side, if it is problematic when shown in Konqueror, maybe we
could use a false shadow picture, but with the 2 sides, as the CSS3 one.
But it is almost only to make it Dillo-proof...
Also, it was a good idea to make the text italic, and the orange RSS logo
make it a little more colorful, which is not bad!
Thank you! Good work!
-Alexandre
I'd prefer shadow using CSS - without additional image.
--
Slávek
However, in all honesty when I first
read Alexandre's description I envisioned something more like the
reflection shown below the icon in this image:
http://rtg.in.ua/galleries/mythtv/mythtv-screen.jpg
We could tone down the reflection a bit and make the horizontal line
more prominent; this would also help segment the page a bit so that the
screenshot isn't running into the news as much,
Thoughts on whether this is a good idea or terrible?
The problem with that is that it involves extra work (possibly
significant extra work, if we want to use the effect on other screenshots
on the site), because every time the screenshot is changed, someone will
have to produce a new "reflection" graphic. It also increases the
vertical space needed for each image to which it's applied by around 1/3,
and might require moving or removing the "More screenshots" link (you'll
notice that your sample image does not have text directly below it).
E. Liddell 