3 Dec
2013
3 Dec
'13
7:02 p.m.
Dne út 3. prosince 2013 Slávek Banko napsal(a):
Seems we were both working on the same thing then. Feel free to
reverse my commit to tde-packaging if you have a better solution. ;-)
Tim
I assume that the user will either use a package kio-umountwrapper from
rename-meta => divert solves this metapackage. Or will uninstall
package kio-umountwrapper due to a conflict with tdeio-umountwrapper =>
diverts solves the original package during the uninstallation.
Before commit I'll test it in Ubuntu 13.10. It takes me a little time.
At this time I tested sucessfully on Debian 6.0.
Slavek
Although proposed method to replace diverts is successfull on tested
Debian when tested on Ubuntu problem persists. As I have now traced, the
origin of the problem is based on multiarch. Metapackage is a different
platform than the replaced original package. Hence, the proposed solution
is not feasible.
Slavek
On Monday 02 of December 2013 23:49:31 Timothy Pearson
wrote:
> > On Monday 02 of December 2013 21:53:33 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 10 of November 2013 06:51:43 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> >> > On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson
wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Sunday 13 of
October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson
wrote:
>>
>> >> > Hello all, Tim,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14
>> >> >> > smooth
>>
>> update
>>
>> >> was
>> >>
>> >> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How
>> >> >> > should they
be
>> >> >> treated?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as
>>
>> conflicting
>>
>> >> /
>> >>
>> >> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push
>> >> >> release
>>
>> back
>>
>> >> yet
>> >>
>> >> >> again. My primary concern is the complaints we would get
>> >> >> if we
>> >>
>> >> blocked
>> >>
>> >> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts
>> >> >> package
>>
>> field.
>>
>> >> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the
>> >> >> majority
of
>> TDE
>>
>> >> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it
>> >> >> first
>>
>> looks.
>>
>> >> >> Let
>> >> >> me see what I can do with it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tim
>> >> >
>> >> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts
>> >> > before
>> >>
>> >> release
>> >>
>> >> > RC1.
>> >> > Should I help?
>> >> >
>> >> > Slavek
>> >>
>> >> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the
>> >> majority of
>>
>> these
>>
>> >> issues. I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be
>> >> updated anywhere
>> >> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Tim
>> >
>> > I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree,
>> > and I
>>
>> did
>>
>> > not
>> > find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
>> >
>> > Slavek
>>
>> So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for
>> R14?
>>
>> Tim
>
> Most of the conflicts were resolved, but still remain conflicts
> qt3-apps-dev × tqt3-apps-dev:
>
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.a
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.a
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.a
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.prl
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.prl
> qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.prl
This should (finally!) be fixed in GIT.
Tim
Great, it looks good.
By the way, just coincidentally I'm also test and solve problems
with upgrade
3.5.13.x => R14 and also solve conflict of diverts
kio-umountwrapper × tdeio-umountwrapper. Hovewer, because it seems
to me wrong to deal with diverts from foreign package, I have
prepared a patch for the package rename-meta => fix for metapackage
kio-umountwrapper.
Slavek
--