Ilya Chernykh wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2011 15:46:09 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
It is pity that such project as KDE3 was cloned by an unstable paranoid psycho.
Until now i was a bystander and I didn't want to participate in this discussion but now I'm getting feeling it's not anymore about which is better/upstream/updated
It was never about which is better/upstream/updated.
It seems originally there were mainly miscommunications between you and Robert. He already apologized for this. Timothy is also sensitive to criticism and the discussion continued.
Pearson has ill memory it seems. He quickly forgot all I did for Trinity to the extent to claim I contributed nothing.
I think I did more than just be considered "a source of headache". This strange property of Timothy's memory is impressing. Not long ago he assigned to me a bugreport to make knetworkmanager compatible with new API (after accepting a first patch from openSUSE's KDE:KDE3). The last discussion in that bugreport
I agree here that Timothy's comment calling KDE:KDE3 obsolete is inappropriate. It seems he felt your response was harsh, but this does not make it appropriate for him to respond in such a way. I would have only expected a response asking for a diff.
I understand it seemed inappropriate to you to be assigned to a bug in Trinity's bugzilla?