9 Oct
2023
9 Oct
'23
4:11 a.m.
Hi Michele, Slavek, all,
The recent changes QT_* -> TQT_* in headers (example Q_EXPORT -> TQ_EXPORT)
are impacting the pinentry application.
I remember we discussed once how we'll proceed with updates, but I do not
recall. I could prepare the patches and probably push upstream.
What is your view on this matter?
thanks in advance
BR
E.
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
9 Oct
9 Oct
6:46 a.m.
On Monday 09 of October 2023 13:11:58 deloptes via tde-devels wrote:
Hi Michele, Slavek, all,
The recent changes QT_* -> TQT_* in headers (example Q_EXPORT ->
TQ_EXPORT) are impacting the pinentry application.
I remember we discussed once how we'll proceed with updates, but I do
not recall. I could prepare the patches and probably push upstream. What
is your view on this matter?
thanks in advance
BR
E.
Hi Emanoil,
this very good reminder and very accurate timing, because at the end of the
month is planned the final R14.1.1.
I completely forgot that the current changes will also have an impact on
pinentry-tqt. It will be great if you can prepare a patch and try to push
it into upstream. I assume that for R14.1.1, we can add a patch into
extra-dependencies repository, unless a new upstream version will be
available.
Thank you!
Cheers
--
Slávek
8:14 a.m.
Slávek Banko via tde-devels wrote:
On Monday 09 of October 2023 13:11:58 deloptes via
tde-devels wrote:
No problem Slavek,
I stumbled on this by accident because I started building for Debian 11.8.
I have also did not check if there are updates upstream. I'll have a look.
However the header QT_H did not change. I was expecting TQT_H to work. What
is your plan regarding this?
pinentry-tqt-1.2.1$ grep QT_H tqt/*
tqt/secqinternal_p.h:#ifndef QT_H
tqt/secqinternal_p.h:#endif // QT_H
tqt/secqlineedit.h:#ifndef QT_H
tqt/secqlineedit.h:#endif // QT_H
tqt/secqstring.h:#ifndef QT_H
tqt/secqstring.h:#endif // QT_H
BR
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
Hi Michele, Slavek, all,
The recent changes QT_* -> TQT_* in headers (example Q_EXPORT ->
TQ_EXPORT) are impacting the pinentry application.
I remember we discussed once how we'll proceed with updates, but I do
not recall. I could prepare the patches and probably push upstream. What
is your view on this matter?
thanks in advance
BR
E.
Hi Emanoil,
this very good reminder and very accurate timing, because at the end of
the month is planned the final R14.1.1.
I completely forgot that the current changes will also have an impact on
pinentry-tqt. It will be great if you can prepare a patch and try to push
it into upstream. I assume that for R14.1.1, we can add a patch into
extra-dependencies repository, unless a new upstream version will be
available.
Thank you!
Cheers
3:37 p.m.
Slávek Banko via tde-devels wrote:
I completely forgot that the current changes will also
have an impact on
pinentry-tqt. It will be great if you can prepare a patch and try to push
it into upstream. I assume that for R14.1.1, we can add a patch into
extra-dependencies repository, unless a new upstream version will be
available.
There is no new version (tag) upstream, but there are few commits on top of
1.2.1
I think few of them might be desirable in pinentry-tqt.
I will push the patch in extra-dependencies repository for now, so that you
can review them. I can also set upstream and merge the upstream commits.
Let me know what you think.
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
11 Oct
11 Oct
1:27 a.m.
On 2023/10/10 07:37 AM, deloptes via tde-devels wrote:
Slávek Banko via tde-devels wrote:
Hi Emanoil,
we can leave the upstream updates for R14.1.2 since R14.1.1 has been soft frozen.
The QT->TQT changes in the patch will be merged because they are needed.
After R14.1.1, feel free to prepare patch with upstream commits.
Cheers
Michele
I completely forgot that the current changes will
also have an impact on
pinentry-tqt. It will be great if you can prepare a patch and try to push
it into upstream. I assume that for R14.1.1, we can add a patch into
extra-dependencies repository, unless a new upstream version will be
available.
There is no new version (tag) upstream, but there are few commits on top of
1.2.1
I think few of them might be desirable in pinentry-tqt.
I will push the patch in extra-dependencies repository for now, so that you
can review them. I can also set upstream and merge the upstream commits.
Let me know what you think.
1:20 p.m.
Michele Calgaro via tde-devels wrote:
Hi Emanoil,
we can leave the upstream updates for R14.1.2 since R14.1.1 has been soft
frozen. The QT->TQT changes in the patch will be merged because they are
needed.
After R14.1.1, feel free to prepare patch with upstream commits.
Hi Michele,
I agree and we'll proceed this way. I tagged the PR with RFC, because I am
not sure that everything I changed to TQ* was indeed changed in the
respective files ... for example there were such as Q_MAC or Q_WIN. Did you
replace all of these? Especially some of the conditionals may not work as
expected. What is your take on that?
thanks and BR
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
14 Oct
14 Oct
6:33 a.m.
On 2023/10/12 05:20 AM, deloptes via tde-devels wrote:
Michele Calgaro via tde-devels wrote:
Replacement is a work in progress, so there is still a mix of Q* and TQ*. But for those
strings that were replaced,
replacement was done everywhere.
Please note TDE R14.1.1 will be released in about two weeks, so we need to finalize that
PR as soon as possible or
pinentry-tqt won't make it otherwise.
Cheers
Michele
Hi Emanoil,
we can leave the upstream updates for R14.1.2 since R14.1.1 has been soft
frozen. The QT->TQT changes in the patch will be merged because they are
needed.
After R14.1.1, feel free to prepare patch with upstream commits.
Hi Michele,
I agree and we'll proceed this way. I tagged the PR with RFC, because I am
not sure that everything I changed to TQ* was indeed changed in the
respective files ... for example there were such as Q_MAC or Q_WIN. Did you
replace all of these? Especially some of the conditionals may not work as
expected. What is your take on that?
15 Oct
15 Oct
12:58 p.m.
Michele Calgaro via tde-devels wrote:
On 2023/10/12 05:20 AM, deloptes via tde-devels
wrote:
Hi Michele,
I did not check mails recently but I saw now your comments. I'll update
respectively and push again in the next few days.
We'll make it definitely for TDE R14.1.1.
Thank you for reviewing and answering also here.
BR
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
Michele Calgaro via tde-devels wrote:
Replacement is a work in progress, so there is still a mix of Q* and TQ*.
But for those strings that were replaced, replacement was done everywhere.
Please note TDE R14.1.1 will be released in about two weeks, so we need to
finalize that PR as soon as possible or pinentry-tqt won't make it
otherwise. Cheers
Michele Hi Emanoil,
we can leave the upstream updates for R14.1.2 since R14.1.1 has been
soft frozen. The QT->TQT changes in the patch will be merged because
they are needed.
After R14.1.1, feel free to prepare patch with upstream commits.
Hi Michele,
I agree and we'll proceed this way. I tagged the PR with RFC, because I
am not sure that everything I changed to TQ* was indeed changed in the
respective files ... for example there were such as Q_MAC or Q_WIN. Did
you replace all of these? Especially some of the conditionals may not
work as expected. What is your take on that?
10 Oct
10 Oct
2:44 p.m.
Slávek Banko via tde-devels wrote:
this very good reminder and very accurate timing,
because at the end of
the month is planned the final R14.1.1.
I pushed the patch - please have a look if all macros, definitions and
conditions were indeed renamed.
BR
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
406
days inactive
412
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
deloptes -
Michele Calgaro -
Slávek Banko