tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

3 participants
3824 discussions

Interest in Contributing for Trinity
by Shauna Recto 11 Feb '26

11 Feb '26

Hi, I have been using TDE for a while now for my old computers and I enjoy the retro aesthetics while being able to just use it with modern applications and I'm wondering if I am able to contribute? While I love using it, there are a few nit picks that I would like to help with, specifically with helping in artwork or anything that is needed right now, which I hope I am able to contribute to. I also have worked on C/C++ projects before in university with my supervisor so I hope I may be of use. I really enjoy the desktop environment, and I would like to be able to make it more usable as time goes on. I hope being on Arch Linux is not an issue for development, otherwise I'm willing to use a different distro. I'm currently reading the wiki and getting acquainted with what ye deal with. I hope to be able to contribute in any way possible Regards, Shauna

2 3

[François] Mageia 10 rejects RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity
by Felix Miata 08 Feb '26

08 Feb '26

It used to be rare that last release of TDE for Mageia wouldn't run in devel version, but it's making a lot of noise now using 9 for 10alpha/beta: # rpmkeys --import RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:25:16Z error: RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import ./RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:25:37Z error: ./RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:26:50Z error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import http://archive.trinitydesktop.net/trinity/rpm/mga9/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:27:54Z error: http://archive.trinitydesktop.net/trinity/rpm/mga9/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # urpmi --auto-select ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing libdrakx-net-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64intl8-0.26-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm drakx-net-applet-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm drakx-net-text-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm gstreamer1.0-plugins-good-1.26.10-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64vpx11-1.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm drakx-net-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm gettext-base-0.26-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm ldetect-lst-0.6.68-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:05:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:18Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 74/235: libdrakx-net ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing alsa-utils-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm libalsa-data-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.noarch.rpm iproute2-6.18.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lpsolve-5.5.2.14-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64bpf1-6.18.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64alsa2-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xmlsec1_1-1.3.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xmlsec1-nss1-1.3.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm xauth-1.1.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:51:14Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:51:14Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 83/235: libalsa-data ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing x11-server-xvfb-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xwayland-24.1.9-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xnest-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64tasn1_6-4.21.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xorg-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm desktop-common-data-10.2-1.mga10.noarch.rpm x11-server-common-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-light-4.0.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-i18n-4.0.0-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64pam0-1.7.1-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64wayland-server0-1.24.0-4.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 92/235: x11-server-common ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing xlockmore-5.87-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm pam-1.7.1-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64notify-gir0.7-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cgraph8-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64notify4-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cdt6-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm libnotify-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-4.0.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cloudproviders0-0.4.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:11Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:11Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 103/235: lib64notify4 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing xinitrc-2.4.21-36.mga10.noarch.rpm thai-data-0.1.30-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xdot4-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm xli-20061110-20.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64pathplan4-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64gvc7-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64thai0-0.1.30-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm fuse-2.9.9-8.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:30Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 112/235: lib64pathplan4 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing lib64avahi-common3-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm mageia-release-Default-10-0.5.mga10.x86_64.rpm mageia-release-common-10-0.5.mga10.x86_64.rpm locales-en-2.42-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64avahi-client3-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64avahi-glib1-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm avahi-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm drak3d-2.9-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64avahi-core7-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm locales-2.42-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:34Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 145/235: lib64avahi-common3 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing ldb-utils-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64smbclient0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64samba1-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-client-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64wbclient0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-common-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm python3-ldb-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64ldb2-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64samba-dc0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:02Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:39:44Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:02Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:39:44Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 176/235: lib64ldb2 ... # :( -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

1 0

Re: [tde-team-sysops] Re: MIRROR FULL
by Mike Bird 01 Jan '26

01 Jan '26

On Thu January 1 2026 01:05:07 Slávek Banko via tde-team-sysops wrote: > Currently, I can simply do a deferred cleanup after the release of the new > version, because the issues discovered with Trixie are now resolved, and > the size of the repository will be significantly reduced. And we will have > time to decide whether to keep multiple versions in the repository until > the finalization before the release of the upcoming R14.1.6. > > Thank you for your great work and I wish you good health and success in the > new year. Thank you and all the TDE devs and sysops for your excellent desktop suite. --Mike

1 0

Georgian langpacks
by Temuri Doghonadze 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

Hello, Could you please tell me what's needed to have packages for Georgian language available by default? Temuri

2 1

[François] [openSUSE] [TW] fubar repodata???
by Felix Miata 01 Dec '25

01 Dec '25

Repos have a mixture of 14.1.5-1 and 14.1.5-2 packages. For some, both versions are present. For others, it looks like only 14.1.5-1. On the currently active installation, it proposed to upgrade from 14.1.4 to 14.1.5-1, but I already had 14.1.5-2 in my LAN cache. I force installation of trinity-kdelibs 14.1.5-2 with rpm, then did an otherwise normal zypper zup, and only kdelibs is at 14.1.5-2. My LAN server cache timestamps for the 14.1.5-2 packages are mostly if not all 26 Nov. Some 14.1.5-1 packages are timestamped today, while others are 13 Nov. This suggests after a previous dup on a different host I was able to get 14.1.5-2 packages installed, and then remove from the cache the 14.1.5-1s for which a 14.1.5-2 was present, thus explaining today timestamps for other 14.1.5-1 packages. I tried another dup using the alternate repo URL (a.t.n vs. m.p.t.o), but it changed nothing, still only tdelibs @14.1.5-2. Are the 14.1.5-2 packages obsolete now? Timestamps (EST/UCT-0500) on mirrors suggest not, with 8 Nov for 14.1.5-1 packages, and 24 Nov for 14.1.5-2 packages. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

3 2

Need help with building TDE sources
by Jan Stolarek 20 Nov '25

20 Nov '25

Dear TDE devs, I would like to try my luck (and skills!) with fixing some of the bugs I've been experiencing with TDE. I need help with making my first steps though. I already have the TDE sources cloned from git repositories. Now I need help with the build process. Ideally, I would like to be able to build a Debian package on a VM dedicated to development, and then install and test that package on my primary desktop machine. I found build instructions on the wiki, but I don't know to what extent these are up-to-date: https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/How_to_Build_TDE_Core_Modules I am confused about the Suggested Build Order section. Do I need to find each of the mentioned components and build it in the listed order? How do I build each of the components? Should I follow with the incantation in "Performing a cmake Build with Ninja" section for each of the components? How to rebuild if dependencies change? If I modify, say, dbus-tqt, do I need to manually rebuild everything that's listed below it in the dependency list? Lastly, once a certain component or application is built, how do I package it? I have no doubt, that the build instructions on the Wiki make a lot of sense for someone who already knows how to build TDE, but for a beginner they feel slightly incomplete. If anyone has the patience to guide me with my baby steps I will greatly apprciate it. Best regards, Janek

4 35

Question about TDE branches
by Jan Stolarek 20 Nov '25

20 Nov '25

I have a quick question about branches in TDE repos. I see that at the moment repositories have two primary development branches: master and r14.1.x. My understanding is that the former is used to provide PTB, while the latter provides PSB. What I would like to know is the development flow. Is the primary development happening on master and then changes are selectively cherry-picked to r14.1.x? What is a logical distinction between master and r14.1.x? From my work in other projects, I would expect that a branch such as r14.1.x will only receive bugfixes, while master will be used as a base for new release branches in the future. That is not how things seem to work in TDE though. Looking at the commits, r14.1.x seems to receive both new features and bugfixes and it seems as if all (?) of the development made on master eventually makes it to r14.1.x. This makes me confused about the intended purpose of the master branch. Also, is there any tentative roadmap for TDE? Is the plan to just continue working on r14.1.x, or are there plans for r14.2.x somewhere down the line? Cheers, Janek

3 4

Designing UI
by Jan Stolarek 19 Nov '25

19 Nov '25

I have yet another question about TDE development: how do I design UI components? Back in the days, I vaguely recall QtCreator was intended for that task, but now I don't think it supports old Qt version used by TDE. I see that UI elements are sourced from the .ui files, which are essentially xml. I imagine that with enough determination I can work by simply modifying those files, but I don't think this is the best way of doing things. So, is there a WYSIWYG editor for developing TDE UI? Cheers, Janek

1 1

[François] [openSUSE] [TW] errant new selinux dependencies?
by Felix Miata 16 Nov '25

16 Nov '25

It seems TW's switch to selinux from apparmor as default wants to install two otherwise unneeded *selinux* packages, selinux-tools & python313-selinux, or else remove most trinity packages. Why, when only non-removable libselinux1 is the only bit of selinux that the OS requires to remain installed? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

2 1

Debian Trixie FTBFS multiple packages
by deloptes 15 Nov '25

15 Nov '25

Hi, I did a fresh Trixie install for chroot. I don't remember to have done something special on Bookworm in order to build properly. Here I attach a file, so that you can see where what problem I faced. The question is why I did not have those issues in Bookworm, but I face them in Trixie. -- FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0

2 5

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels