tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

6 participants
3828 discussions

[François] [Gen2 iGPU] TDM locks up local I/O in Mageia 10
by Felix Miata 09 Mar '26

09 Mar '26

I realize using TDE for Mageia 9 on Mageia 10 can't be expected to be perfect, but there is no other option than to wait until built for it, and I've had good success for several releases until 10, starting last September. 10 is now in beta, so should only be some weeks until release. This particular case is on 32bit, so may have nothing to do with software versions other than end of support by Mesa for the Gen2 0x2572 iGPU. The thing is, same PC works just fine with Tumbleweed, KDM3, 6.18.9 and 6.19.6 kernels, and newer Mesa 26.0.1, while 10 has mesa 25.3.6. I'm hoping there is a way to rule out Mageia mesa and X problems prior to release of either 10 or 14.1.6. # systemctl status tdm ● tdm.service - Trinity Display Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/tdm.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2026-03-09 12:09:31 EDT; 28min ago Invocation: ff9b163fafed46f5918a23a3befbd915 Docs: man:tdm-trinity(1) Main PID: 958 (tdm) Tasks: 1 (limit: 3525) CPU: 753ms CGroup: /system.slice/tdm.service └─958 /opt/trinity/bin/tdm Mar 09 12:09:31 gx27c systemd[1]: Started Trinity Display Manager. # dmesg | grep -E 'aile|drm' [ 33.925764] systemd[1]: Starting Load Kernel Module drm... [ 34.604120] ACPI: bus type drm_connector registered [ 34.606161] systemd[1]: modprobe(a)drm.service: Deactivated successfully. [ 34.606688] systemd[1]: Finished Load Kernel Module drm. [ 38.043169] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Found i865g (device ID 2572) integrated display version 2.00 stepping N/A [ 38.074479] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Initialized overlay support. [ 38.075005] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0 [ 38.123326] fbcon: i915drmfb (fb0) is primary device [ 38.207725] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] fb0: i915drmfb frame buffer device [ 40.298561] faux_driver regulatory: Direct firmware load for regulatory.db failed with error -2 [ 40.298583] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db # tail -18 /var/log/tdm.log X.Org X Server 1.21.1.21 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Current Operating System: Linux gx27c 6.18.16-desktop-1.mga10 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 4 21:26:12 UTC 2026 i686 Kernel command line: root=LABEL=mga10p19 rw audit=0 ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 plymouth.enable=0 noresume consoleblank=0 mitigations=off Build ID: x11-server 21.1.21-9.mga10 Current version of pixman: 0.46.4 Before reporting problems, check https://bugs.mageia.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Mar 9 12:14:03 2026 (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d" (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d" MESA: warning: Driver does not support the 0x2572 PCI ID. Mar 9 12:15:03 tdm[958] error: X server startup timeout, terminating Mar 9 12:16:03 tdm[958] info: X server termination timeout, killing Mar 9 12:16:03 tdm[958] error: X server for display :0 can't be started, session disabled # journalctl -b -p3 Mar 09 12:09:25 gx27c rpcbind[593]: cannot create socket for udp6 Mar 09 12:09:25 gx27c rpcbind[593]: cannot create socket for tcp6 Mar 09 12:09:31 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol Mar 09 12:09:31 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol Mar 09 12:09:31 gx27c rpc.statd[955]: Failed to create listener xprt (statd, 1, udp6) Mar 09 12:09:32 gx27c rpc.statd[955]: Failed to create listener xprt (statd, 1, tcp6) Mar 09 12:09:32 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol Mar 09 12:09:32 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol Mar 09 12:09:32 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol Mar 09 12:09:32 gx27c rpc.mountd[942]: Could not make a socket: (97) Address family not supported by protocol No such problem in Tumbleweed and KDM3 with 6.18.9 or 6.19.6 kernels: # pinxi -GSaz --vs --za --hostname pinxi 3.3.40-01 (2025-11-25) System: Host: gx27c Kernel: 6.19.6-1-default arch: i686 bits: 32 compiler: gcc v: 15.2.1 clocksource: tsc avail: hpet,acpi_pm parameters: root=/dev/sda10 rw ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 noresume consoleblank=0 mitigations=off Desktop: KDE v: 3.5.10 tk: Qt v: 3.3.8c wm: kwin with: kicker vt: 7 dm: 1: KDM note: stopped 2: XDM Distro: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20260308 Graphics: Device-1: Intel 82865G Integrated Graphics vendor: Dell driver: i915 v: kernel arch: Gen-2 process: Intel 130nm built: 2002-03 ports: active: VGA-1 empty: none bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:2572 class-ID: 0300 Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 21.1.21 compositor: kwin driver: X: loaded: intel unloaded: modesetting alternate: fbdev,vesa dri: swrast gpu: i915 display-ID: :0 screens: 1 Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1680x1050 s-dpi: 108 s-size: 395x246mm (15.55x9.69") s-diag: 465mm (18.32") Monitor-1: VGA-1 mapped: VGA1 model: Dell P2213 serial: <filter> built: 2013 res: mode: 1680x1050 hz: 60 scale: 100% (1) dpi: 91 gamma: 1.2 size: 470x300mm (18.5x11.81") diag: 558mm (22") ratio: 16:10 modes: max: 1680x1050 min: 720x400 API: EGL Message: Unreliable API tool+hardware. Override with --egl. API: OpenGL v: 4.5 vendor: mesa v: 26.0.1 glx-v: 1.4 es-v: 3.2 direct-render: yes renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 21.1.8 128 bits) device-ID: ffffffff:ffffffff memory: 1.42 GiB unified: yes API: Vulkan v: 1.4.341 layers: 2 device: 0 type: cpu name: llvmpipe (LLVM 21.1.8 128 bits) driver: mesa llvmpipe v: 26.0.1 (LLVM 21.1.8) device-ID: 10005:0000 surfaces: N/A Info: Tools: api: clinfo, eglinfo, glxinfo, vulkaninfo x11: xdriinfo, xdpyinfo, xprop, xrandr # free total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 1522856 425816 858464 80332 496048 1097040 Swap: 1052220 0 1052220 # -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

2 1

Why are all the source archives bad?
by E. Liddell 08 Mar '26

08 Mar '26

When upgrading to 14.1.4 and then to 14.1.5, I was bombarded with the following messages indicating the .tar.xz files have some issue: * Messages for package trinity-base/kcheckpass-14.1.5: * tar extract command failed at least partially - continuing anyway * Messages for package trinity-base/tdm-14.1.5: * tar extract command failed at least partially - continuing anyway * Messages for package trinity-base/kdesktop-14.1.5: * tar extract command failed at least partially - continuing anyway This happens for all the TDE core packages (but not for k3b). I don't remember whether it was an issue with versions before 14.1.4. It would just be a mildly irritating bit of log spam except for one thing: one of my machines is behind a corporate firewall that I do not control, and it *hates* compressed files it can't open and inspect. So I have to move the files to it via sneakernet. Is whatever method is being used to create these files adding trailing garbage or something? E. Liddell

3 4

Getting SMTP connection error when attempting to upload mail to mail.com
by jlt1 05 Mar '26

05 Mar '26

For some reason, for several days now when KMail tries to upload mail to smtp.mail.com I get the following message: | Sending failed: | | Connection to host smtp.mail.com is broken. | | The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox' folder. | | The following transport protocol was used: | | mail.com I have tried deleting and recreating my settings for outbound mail in KMail's Settings => Accounts, Sending but that hasn't fixed the problem. I am able to ping smtp.mail.com, so the server is reachable. Is anyone else having issues connecting to SMTP servers? Leslie (sent via the mail.com web interface)

2 1

tde-packaging-gentoo: Request for application to GPO
by cat 21 Feb '26

21 Feb '26

Hello, I would appreciate if the gentoo overlay could be listed on GPO, Gentoo's official overlays list, to make it easier to find. You can find information on how to do so here: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Overlays/Overlays_guide#Requesting_add… I also would recommend that the overlay name is changed to "trinity", unless there is some conflict with other overlays or a particular reason why the "trinity-official" overlay name must be used. Layman is no longer used on gentoo either, you should instead provide a command such as: eselect repository add trinity-official git https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/TDE/tde-packaging-gentoo.git or, in the future, supposing you prefer to keep the overlay named "trinity-official" and the overlay is added to the official overlays list: eselect repository enable trinity-official I would have preferred to have filed this as an issue on tde-packaging-gentoo, but the Gitea does not appear open for registration. I would also appreciate if the documentation here: https://www.trinitydesktop.org/support.php could be updated to reflect that. Kind regards, cat

2 2

Interest in Contributing for Trinity
by Shauna Recto 11 Feb '26

11 Feb '26

Hi, I have been using TDE for a while now for my old computers and I enjoy the retro aesthetics while being able to just use it with modern applications and I'm wondering if I am able to contribute? While I love using it, there are a few nit picks that I would like to help with, specifically with helping in artwork or anything that is needed right now, which I hope I am able to contribute to. I also have worked on C/C++ projects before in university with my supervisor so I hope I may be of use. I really enjoy the desktop environment, and I would like to be able to make it more usable as time goes on. I hope being on Arch Linux is not an issue for development, otherwise I'm willing to use a different distro. I'm currently reading the wiki and getting acquainted with what ye deal with. I hope to be able to contribute in any way possible Regards, Shauna

2 3

[François] Mageia 10 rejects RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity
by Felix Miata 09 Feb '26

09 Feb '26

It used to be rare that last release of TDE for Mageia wouldn't run in devel version, but it's making a lot of noise now using 9 for 10alpha/beta: # rpmkeys --import RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:25:16Z error: RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import ./RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:25:37Z error: ./RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:26:50Z error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # rpmkeys --import http://archive.trinitydesktop.net/trinity/rpm/mga9/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity error: Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: Policy rejects 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:27:54Z error: http://archive.trinitydesktop.net/trinity/rpm/mga9/RPM-GPG-KEY-trinity: key 1 import failed. # urpmi --auto-select ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing libdrakx-net-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64intl8-0.26-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm drakx-net-applet-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm drakx-net-text-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm gstreamer1.0-plugins-good-1.26.10-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64vpx11-1.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm drakx-net-2.62-1.mga10.noarch.rpm gettext-base-0.26-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm ldetect-lst-0.6.68-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:05:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:18Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 74/235: libdrakx-net ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing alsa-utils-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm libalsa-data-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.noarch.rpm iproute2-6.18.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lpsolve-5.5.2.14-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64bpf1-6.18.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64alsa2-1.2.15.2-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xmlsec1_1-1.3.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xmlsec1-nss1-1.3.9-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm xauth-1.1.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:51:14Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:51:14Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2017-07-23T18:55:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:45Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:32Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 83/235: libalsa-data ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing x11-server-xvfb-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xwayland-24.1.9-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xnest-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64tasn1_6-4.21.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm x11-server-xorg-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm desktop-common-data-10.2-1.mga10.noarch.rpm x11-server-common-21.1.21-5.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-light-4.0.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-i18n-4.0.0-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64pam0-1.7.1-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64wayland-server0-1.24.0-4.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:35:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 92/235: x11-server-common ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing xlockmore-5.87-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm pam-1.7.1-2.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64notify-gir0.7-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cgraph8-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64notify4-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cdt6-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm libnotify-0.8.8-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm icewm-4.0.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64cloudproviders0-0.4.0-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:06:59Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:11Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:11Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 103/235: lib64notify4 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing xinitrc-2.4.21-36.mga10.noarch.rpm thai-data-0.1.30-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64xdot4-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm xli-20061110-20.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64pathplan4-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64gvc7-14.1.1-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64thai0-0.1.30-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm fuse-2.9.9-8.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:21Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:36:30Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 112/235: lib64pathplan4 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing lib64avahi-common3-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm mageia-release-Default-10-0.5.mga10.x86_64.rpm mageia-release-common-10-0.5.mga10.x86_64.rpm locales-en-2.42-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64avahi-client3-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64avahi-glib1-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm avahi-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm drak3d-2.9-1.mga10.noarch.rpm lib64avahi-core7-0.8-17.mga10.x86_64.rpm locales-2.42-3.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-08T13:50:34Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-22T13:52:08Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:37:46Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 145/235: lib64avahi-common3 ... https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/10/x86_64/media/core/r… installing ldb-utils-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64smbclient0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64samba1-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-client-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64wbclient0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-common-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm python3-ldb-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64ldb2-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm samba-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm lib64samba-dc0-4.23.5-1.mga10.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:02Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:39:44Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z error: Verifying a signature using certificate 71236F0FF403B2B663E744111DBAA9EB2AB131C6 (Trinity Desktop Environment (RPM Signing Key) <francois.andriot(a)free.fr>): 1. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2025-11-24T19:07:02Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z 2. Certificate 1DBAA9EB2AB131C6 invalid: policy violation because: No binding signature at time 2026-02-09T00:39:44Z because: Policy rejected non-revocation signature (PositiveCertification) requiring second pre-image resistance because: SHA1 is not considered secure since 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z Preparing... ########################################################################################################################################################## 176/235: lib64ldb2 ... # :( -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

1 0

Re: [tde-team-sysops] Re: MIRROR FULL
by Mike Bird 01 Jan '26

01 Jan '26

On Thu January 1 2026 01:05:07 Slávek Banko via tde-team-sysops wrote: > Currently, I can simply do a deferred cleanup after the release of the new > version, because the issues discovered with Trixie are now resolved, and > the size of the repository will be significantly reduced. And we will have > time to decide whether to keep multiple versions in the repository until > the finalization before the release of the upcoming R14.1.6. > > Thank you for your great work and I wish you good health and success in the > new year. Thank you and all the TDE devs and sysops for your excellent desktop suite. --Mike

1 0

Georgian langpacks
by Temuri Doghonadze 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

Hello, Could you please tell me what's needed to have packages for Georgian language available by default? Temuri

2 1

[François] [openSUSE] [TW] fubar repodata???
by Felix Miata 01 Dec '25

01 Dec '25

Repos have a mixture of 14.1.5-1 and 14.1.5-2 packages. For some, both versions are present. For others, it looks like only 14.1.5-1. On the currently active installation, it proposed to upgrade from 14.1.4 to 14.1.5-1, but I already had 14.1.5-2 in my LAN cache. I force installation of trinity-kdelibs 14.1.5-2 with rpm, then did an otherwise normal zypper zup, and only kdelibs is at 14.1.5-2. My LAN server cache timestamps for the 14.1.5-2 packages are mostly if not all 26 Nov. Some 14.1.5-1 packages are timestamped today, while others are 13 Nov. This suggests after a previous dup on a different host I was able to get 14.1.5-2 packages installed, and then remove from the cache the 14.1.5-1s for which a 14.1.5-2 was present, thus explaining today timestamps for other 14.1.5-1 packages. I tried another dup using the alternate repo URL (a.t.n vs. m.p.t.o), but it changed nothing, still only tdelibs @14.1.5-2. Are the 14.1.5-2 packages obsolete now? Timestamps (EST/UCT-0500) on mirrors suggest not, with 8 Nov for 14.1.5-1 packages, and 24 Nov for 14.1.5-2 packages. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

3 2

Need help with building TDE sources
by Jan Stolarek 20 Nov '25

20 Nov '25

Dear TDE devs, I would like to try my luck (and skills!) with fixing some of the bugs I've been experiencing with TDE. I need help with making my first steps though. I already have the TDE sources cloned from git repositories. Now I need help with the build process. Ideally, I would like to be able to build a Debian package on a VM dedicated to development, and then install and test that package on my primary desktop machine. I found build instructions on the wiki, but I don't know to what extent these are up-to-date: https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/How_to_Build_TDE_Core_Modules I am confused about the Suggested Build Order section. Do I need to find each of the mentioned components and build it in the listed order? How do I build each of the components? Should I follow with the incantation in "Performing a cmake Build with Ninja" section for each of the components? How to rebuild if dependencies change? If I modify, say, dbus-tqt, do I need to manually rebuild everything that's listed below it in the dependency list? Lastly, once a certain component or application is built, how do I package it? I have no doubt, that the build instructions on the Wiki make a lot of sense for someone who already knows how to build TDE, but for a beginner they feel slightly incomplete. If anyone has the patience to guide me with my baby steps I will greatly apprciate it. Best regards, Janek

4 35

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels