Hello folks,
Can anyone tell me how to remove or disable KWallet?
I recently added a couple of new very low traffic e-mail to accounts to check
and I want to store their passwords. However, I don't want to use KWallet
and instead I just store them in the kmail config file. The problem is that
now, every time I close Kmail I get a prompt to set up KWallet and when I
decline to use it I'm then prompted to save the passwords again. If I simply
close the KWallet prompt I lose the saved passwords and then have to look
them up and re-enter them each time I check the accounts.
This is really annoying.
So, is there some way of removing KWallet entirely or at least disabling it?
TIA
LeeE
Hi all,
It's been a few days, when it was officially released a new version of
Ubuntu - Quantal Quetzal. Although I have not yet seen questions on the
availability of Trinity for this new version, I would like to inform you that
are available for testing basic packages Trinity stable branch - 3.5.13-sru:
https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/axis/+packag…
Are available so far only basic packages - application packages will be added
subsequently. I note that I do not have a test machine with Quantal, so
you'll be the first one to test the packages in practice.
Slavek
--
I just tried to get starting with kdevelop. Somehow I cannot get the
development files installed:
# apt-get install libqt3-mt-dev libqt3-mt
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libqt3-mt is already the newest version.
libqt3-mt set to manually installed.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libqt3-mt-dev : Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.8d-1ubuntu0+ax1~squeeze) but
3:3.3.8-d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Any idea how to correct that?
Nik
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:03 AM,
<trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net mailing list.
[snip]
> --8701F456024E.1348439718/vali.starlink.edu
> Content-Description: Delivery report
> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; vali.starlink.edu
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 8701F456024E
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; trinity-users-return-3629-robxu9=gmail.com(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> Arrival-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:35:17 -0500 (CDT)
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; robxu9(a)gmail.com
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;robxu9(a)gmail.com
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.7.1
> Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Unauthenticated email is not accepted from
> this domain. k2si7073925igo.55
>
[snip]
> Subject: Re: [trinity-users] Unsubscribe threat
>
> What is beginning to happen around the net -- with 'responsible' ISPs --
> is the enforcement of Forward-confirmed reverse DNS (FCrDNS)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-confirmed_reverse_DNS
> -and-
>
> Sender Policy Framework (SPF)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
>
> In a nutshell, lists email distribution is affected because the emails
> are re-sent by the list server as From: The_Originator(a)example.com.
> Which is true -- it did originate "From:" me, or "From:" you.
> But, it appears to be a forgery to incoming mailservers that do this
> checking, because those emails CANNOT be "From:" that user from THAT MTA.
>
> For example, this email - From: Jonesy <trinity(a)jonz.net> cannot
> be sent from the mail servers at vali.starlink.edu --- at least not
> with FCrDNS checking.
>
> FCrDNS cuts down on A LOT of spam. My SysAdmin says 90% of incoming
> email is pure crap spam -- with forged "From:"s out of cracked botnet
> machines. FCrDNS cuts down on ALMOST ALL of that.
> Think of the savings...
>
> But, I've had to remove my domain from that checking by my ISP because
> I am on so many lists, email reflectors, what-ever-you-call-them.
> Eventually lists will have to evolve to some different scheme.
Huh? So you are intentionally having emails bounce?
>
> Too much information?
> Jonesy
>
brb; head hurts ;P
--
later daze. :: Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu
Hello
I just wanted to change some setting of the users of the
system. But when I try to access the user management via the
KDE control center I obtain the following error message:
(Using Kubuntu 10.04 and the latest trinity package)
,----
|
| The module User Management could not be loaded.
| Possible reasons:
| * An error occurred during your last kde upgrade leaving an orphaned control module
| * You have old third party modules lying around
|
| Check these points carefully and try to remove the module mentioned
| in the error message. If this fails, consider contacting your distributor
| or packager.
`----
Which package is missing?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
Hi guys,
Is there any chance you would prepare TDE packages for Debian Wheezy
(testing)? I recently changed the release because the packages I used
on Debian stable were outdated and I really miss Trinity Desktop.
Yours,
d33tah
Hi,
I have been using Ubuntu 12.04 with xfce/xubuntu as long as there was no trinity repository available. Now that I have updated to the trinity desktop, there seem to be some problems that I can't figure out. Firstly, I want single-click activation on the desktop and in the file manager, but can't find the place where to configure this.
Then, I am missing the Sleep and Hibernate buttons on logout.
Both of the mentioned items have been working ok on my previous setup with kubuntu-trinity 10.10.
Anybody have some hints how to rectify this?
Thanks,
Mike
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 11:23 +0000,
trinity-users-digest-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net wrote:
> This might be a KDevelop bug; TQDIALOG_OBJECT_NAME_STRING was
> not replaced
> at compile-time as it probably should have been. However,
> this brings up
> an interesting point; a native Qt3 application will not be
> compatible with
> TQt3, which TDE will use as of R14.0, without replacement of
> the various
> Q* objects with TQ* objects.
>
> Tim
>
OUCH! I recognize that we are far behind the curve on migrating Qt4 but
we do not have the resources migrate this important application at this
time. But this seems a bit strange. Doesn't that violate the whole
idea of Qt being cross platform? What if I want to run my old Qt3
application on a platform that does not have TDE installed? Thanks -
John
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 11:23 +0000,
trinity-users-digest-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net wrote:
> Hello, all. I am completely hobbled in KDevelop since
> upgrading to
> > 3.5.13.1. On 3.5.12, all worked fine. Now, I cannot
> compile. Not
> > being a heavy duty programmer, I am somewhat hampered in
> troubleshooting
> > this but it has me stopped in my tracks at work.
> >
> > I added a new .ui file and it corresponding subclasses and
> tried to
> > compile. It failed immediately with an error about tqt
> missing but I'm
> > building a qt3 application. I ran distclean followed by
> automake and
> > friends. When I run configure, I receive a warning about:
> >
> > checking if TQt is available... no
> > configure: WARNING: You are attempting to compile Trinity
> without the
> > Trinity Qt Interface installed. Please install
> libtqtinterface-dev and
> > try again!
> >
> > I've checked and libtqtinterface-dev is installed. I don't
> know why
> > it's even checking for TQt.
> >
> > When I try to build, I get:
> >
> > /usr/share/qt3/bin/moc
> > /home/jsullivan/gitISCS/iscs/spm/src/acceptcadialog.h
> acceptcadialog.moc
> > Qt meta object compiler
> > moc: Too many input files specified
> > Usage: moc [options] <header-file>
> > -o file Write output to file rather than stdout
> > -f[file] Force #include, optional file name
> > -p path Path prefix for included file
> > -i Do not generate an #include statement
> > -k Do not stop on errors
> > -nw Do not display warnings
> > -v Display version of moc
> > make[2]: *** [acceptcadialog.moc] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > *** Exited with status: 2 ***
> >
> > What is going on here? Is there a bug where the output file
> in the moc
> > command is not being preceded with a -o?
> >
> > I also thought it a bad indication when I checked my Qt
> Options for the
> > project and the Qt3 directory was set to /usr and in glaring
> red
> > (meaning it is not a valid qt3 directory). I changed it
> back
> > to /usr/share/qt3 but it is still showing as red.
> >
> > I'm very badly stuck on a major project so all help is
> deeply
> > appreciated. Thanks - John
>
> You are probably using an outdated admin/ directory in your
> project. It
> is not very well known that kdevelop includes the same
> automake files as
> all other TDE applications in each project you create;
> unfortunately these
> files, once created, are never updated by kdevelop. I would
> try replacing
> the admin/ directory inside your project with the latest
> 3.5.13.1 version
> from GIT at http://git.trinitydesktop.org/cgit/admin/. Do NOT
> use the
> latest GIT head version; instead use the link for the 3.5.13.1
> SRU version
> (http://git.trinitydesktop.org/cgit/admin/snapshot/admin-3.5.13.1.tar.gz).
>
> Tim
Thanks very much, Tim. That did the trick. Knowing very little about
automake, I have no idea why it worked but I've very glad it did! - John