William Morder composed on 2018-02-20 11:58 (UTC-0800):
> > If I recall correctly, pico was originally
the editor for the pine
> > mailer, and nano was a clone of it created to avoid licensing issues.
> > And yes, for the casual user who doesn't intend to immerse him- or
> > herself in a command-line editor, nano is superior to either vi or emacs.
> Regarding editors
> If you have not heard of, there is "ne",
which is my favorite command line
> editor - unfortunately is not installed by default in debian and is not
> available on other distros.
> It is however impressive. I can recommend
Thanks much, will check that out.
Not counting sed and email, the editors I use 99.8%+ of my time on Linux are
those built into OFMs, which for me are Midnight Commander and FileCommander/L.
~.01% or less of the time that no OFM is or can be made available, I use Nano.
Usually if MC isn't installed I try installing it first before trying any
fallback. MC in Konsole is one of the bits that hooked me on KDE back around the
turn of the century.
--
"Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata ***
http://fm.no-ip.com/