15 Sep
2011
15 Sep
'11
4:01 p.m.
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:17:58 Bimal Rekhadiya
wrote:
Personally, I have looked at all three and I strongly dislike all three. They
are exclusive not inclusive (i.e. not accessoble to the handicapped), do not
follow web standards (don't work with Konqueror, my usual and preferred
browser - ironic for sites that are proposed as suitable for Konqueror's main
home) and are far too glitzy.
+1
Yes sure.. Here are some links of my work:
http://www.brcreation.com/
Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 54 Errors, 67 warning(s)
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)
and so many..
Indeed
Jonesy who does websites, too -- but I ain't ever going to
barge in on someone else's turf without an invite...
--
Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux
Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __
38.238N 104.547W | config.com | DM78rf | SK