On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:17:58 Bimal Rekhadiya wrote:
Personally, I have looked at all three and I strongly dislike all three. They are exclusive not inclusive (i.e. not accessoble to the handicapped), do not follow web standards (don't work with Konqueror, my usual and preferred browser - ironic for sites that are proposed as suitable for Konqueror's main home) and are far too glitzy.
+1
Yes sure.. Here are some links of my work:
Errors found while checking this document as HTML5! Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: 54 Errors, 67 warning(s)
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)
and so many..
Indeed
Jonesy who does websites, too -- but I ain't ever going to barge in on someone else's turf without an invite...