I have a specific need for a tailored appliance version of what you are
proposing. It is the bootable client appliance remote-desktop front-end for
an end-user F95-based modeling language
<http://www.metacalculus.com/lens/Spiritext.html> surrounded by xterm menu
scaffolding <http://www.metacalculus.com/lens/MIDUS.html> in Perl. The
remote desktop server is configured as a TDE R14 Ubuntu 14.04 Togglebox VPS
now. It is part of the scaffolding for an end-user development (EUD) type
of workflow called quality assurance and evolution (QAE) to extend a
science exploration modeling technology called MetaCalculus
<http://www.metacalculus.com>, which has been under continuous development
for 50 years.
End users can connect to this remote middleware via NX remote desktops
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NX_technology> from the bootable appliances,
similarly configured as TDE-Ubuntu or TDE-PCLinux
<http://trinity.mypclinuxos.com/> distros on LiveCD or LIVE USB sticks. NX
remote desktops communicate through FreeNX server apps, and NoMachine
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoMachine>, Remmina
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remmina> or X2GO
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X2Go> client apps.
The front-end PC and Togglebox TDE desktops are preconfigured mirrors that
merge with each other, each having 20 virtual desktops accessed though side
panel pagers (client-right opposing server-left). Taskbar panels similarly
oppose each other (client-top opposing server-bottom). This is the
front-end of a server-based MetaCalculus "automation lab" (AutoLab).
This dual mirrored OS client-server "AutoLab ensemble desktop environment
<http://www.metacalculus.com/doc/MIDUS/AutoLab_Desktops.html>" is designed
for shared menu-guided workflow of an EUD-QAE team on a collection of
virtual desktops, some on client and some on server via several connected
interactive sessions spanning multiple servers, where up to 400 (20 x 20)
sessions may be running simultaneously from a single PC workstation. And
since NX supports desktop sharing, the desktop collection can span teams of
overlapping user workflow sharing of teachers and students.
As you can imagine, this dual OS Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
ensemble is designed as an integrated front and middleware interactive
workflow environment, which in turn fronts a background massively
parallel Docker
batch system for cloud supercomputing, using AWS et al
<http://www.metacalculus.com/AutoKey/Linux_VAR_Wholesale_AutoLabs.png>. It
can integrate "super SaaS" collaborative open-source development and K-12
end-user STEM education
<http://www.metacalculus.com/AutoKey/Retail_Linux_USB_Appliances.png>.
The modeling language, an F95 Extension "NeoFortran" supporting the
modeling solver and kernel API of the original mainframe PROSE language
<http://www.metacalculus.com/doc/imgzoom/HolonModelingInPROSE2.png>, can
operate on all three of these computing layers (client PC, Togglebox VPS,
or AWS et al) in various configurations (from client tablets for K-12
students to Togglebox VPS's for developers to AWS Docker jobs for
high-fidelity big-data simulation models globally optimized in massive
parallel jobs).
Since the NeoFortran is an optimization modeling language
<http://www.metacalculus.com/doc/FC/Synthetic_Calculus.pdf> which can
optimize system-dynamics models
<https://www.google.com/search?q=System+Dynamics+Images&espv=2&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiS7u-4mZnOAhVExGMKHe3CBXwQsAQIIg&biw=1536&bih=829&dpr=1.25
translated via the XMILE protocol
<http://www.metacalculus.com/AutoKey/MCSD/XMILE_Example.png>; and since
optimization searching is embarrassingly parallel
<http://www.metacalculus.com/doc/DigiCal/MOBHeraJupiter.html>, this
integrated environment can support interactive SERIAL modeling of parallel
optimization processing
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uLtZUZybn3uxYIxrmB5If8bNmWxM_ZASbfPNRqinAGQ/edit#gid=0
in the cloud (similar to web searches), *without
any parallel programming*.
Simplification of this parallel processing is what I am working on now.
Although I am a Trinity user, and have been since the fatal KDE4 fork that
set back my downstream development by several years, I don't participate in
this forum much, but I would like to see Trinity win the desktop race. As
you can probably tell, most of the higher infrastructure I have shown in
the links above was accomplished before that plasmoid fork. Ironically KDE
(as one of the original two Linux desktop environments) is still more
generally sanctioned than TDE. But the general trend (Windows style war)
that forking trend was part of has hobbled the whole Linux community in
another pursuit of the Tower of Babel.
I would like to see the Trinity community adopt this LiveCD/USBstick
Linux-boot ensemble as a QAE project and expand its desktop functionality.
There are many TDE improvements I can think of that this QAE effort would
mandate. Not the least would be integrated QA with the NX clients, which
would significantly improve overall Linux interface reliability. This
effort would enable TDE to trump the KDE style leadership with EUD-friendly
practicality. The intent is to adapt more of an EUD "walled garden"
approach, like Apple has achieved with the Mac, in order to broaden Linux
EUD.
In the above links you see evidence of a host of integrated EUD automation
apps designed to lift the OS development focus out of the "Windows style
swamp" that the Linux downstream community has blundered into.
My intent is to emerge new EUD order out of this chaos by giving* the
original computing language new life in the clouds: optimization of
simulation modeling in parallel processing, without parallel programming*.
This can be the killer app to transform the industry the way Fortran did
originally, by exploding diversity in R&D; something IT middlemen cannot
accomplish on their own, because they are not diversified enough to match
the diversity of science, like end-users are. Thus we need to simplify and
generalize advanced Linux EUD as this ensemble aims to do.
Cheers,
Joseph 'Bear' Thames
On Jul 29, 2016 5:24 AM, "Felix Miata" <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Marvin Jones composed on 2016-07-29 06:11 (UTC-0600):
>
>
>> I am building a new workstation and I really,
Really, REALLY
>> want to fire it up with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with Trinity R14.0.3.
>
>
>> Live CD for Xenial yet? Or, is a Live CD under construction? Or,
>> has anyone installed installed TDE 14.0.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 yet and
>> could/would share their experiences if I run into "challenges"
>> during a raw install?
>
>
>> I don't believe I've seen any chatter
about Ubuntu 16.04 on this list.
>> And, I really do not want to start out 2-years old with Ubuntu 14.04.
>> "Inertia" usually prevents me from upgrading releases once I have a
>> solid linux workstaion humming along. Hell, my primary workstation is
>> $ cat /etc/lsb-release
>> DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
>> DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
>> DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
>> DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS"
>> ... with TDE 3.5.13.3
> I did minimal 16.04 HTTP minimal installs on two 64 bit machines, then
added 14.03. I recall no trouble with either.
> --
> "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
> words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 **
a11y rocks!
> Felix Miata ***
http://fm.no-ip.com/
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting