6 Dec
2011
6 Dec
'11
6:38 p.m.
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 18:00:26 Brad Rogers wrote:
Timothy and the rest of the team have to balance the
needs of all sorts
of people, often pulling in different directions, with the practicality
of achieving what those people want. You're aware, no doubt, that
what /seems/ to be a trivial matter to fix may not in fact be that easy
to overcome.
I clearly have a quirky view of this. It seems to me that Timothy and the
others working hard at this do not have to "balance the needs of all sorts of
people". Why should they take any notice of those needs? If they just chose
a path and stick to it, and if that path lead to somewhere of their own
choosing, rather than those of the conflicting claims of others, that seems
to me fine.
I am grateful for what they do. I am grateful for being allowed to travel in
their slipstream. I reckon that I can take it or leave it. If I choose to
take it, I do so on my own responsibility and Timothy et al owe me nothing
and are not required to "meet my needs". It is not as though I am
contributing anything.
And anyway, whatever they do they will never please everybody. I hate the
revolving cube. I have just seen a eulogy from someone who loves it.
Lisi