On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 09:04:32PM -0800, Dan Youngquist via tde-users wrote:
On 1/16/21 8:00 PM, Michele Calgaro via tde-users
wrote:
What are the advantages of bottom posting? I
can't fiugre them out to be
honest.
The advantage is, you can trim all but the relevant line or two to which
you're replying, and do that with multiple sentences/paragraphs if
necessary, replying to each right along with the text to which you're
replying, and have a nice neat post that's easy for anyyone to read and
follow. It even works well when it's helpful to include a couple layers of
quotes for continuity, as long as you trim what's not relevant.
That's not bottom posting.
You're not posting your content at the *bottom* of the untrimmed, fully
quoted message you replied to. You're posting your content interleaved
between quoted text, like a good netizen.
-- Top posting --
My reply.
Third post in full.
> Second post in full.
> > First post in full.
-- Bottom posting --
First post in full.
Second post in full.
Third post in full.
My reply.
-- Inline posting --
Relevent parts of third post.
My reply.
Just enough
quoting to establish context.
Additional relevant parts of third post.
My
reply.
Harder to describe than to do, unless you have a really awful mail
client like GMail or Outlook.
Of course, it doesn't work when people don't
bother to trim anything, and
just add their 1 or 2 lines at the bottom of dozens and dozens of lines with
8 layers of completely irrelevant quotes, which makes it very difficult to read.
And *that* horror is bottom-posting.
--
Steve