On Wednesday 18 June 2014 13:56:51 you wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Nik on this one. Switching to 64 bit does not make as
much changes as it seems to do theorically. If you are reinstalling
everything, you can go for it, but it is not worth loosing all your
''computer setup'' for that.
-Alexandre
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:23:31 -0400
> From: Howland(a)Priss.com
> To: trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> Subject: Re: [trinity-users] 64 bit?
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Timothy Pearson
>
> <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
> > The only major difference between the various TDE architectures
> > is how they are built--it is the same source code for any of
> > them, so the decision to go with i386/amd64 is generally made
> > based on needed features for other applications such as the >4GB
> > per-process memory limit amd64 offers.
> >
> > Tim
>
> Doing CPU mining of some cryptocoins, I ran the same mining
> software (compiled for 32 or 64 bit of course) on 32bit Debian
> Linux, then 64bit Debian, on the same hardware.
>
> The 64bit mining achieved nearly twice the hashes per second as the
> 32bit.
>
> If this is true of more than just the mining software, it could be
> the reason for the apparent speed-up.
>
> WINE still has only 32bit binaries, which is sad, but I live with
> that because of Debian's "multi-arch".
>
> Curt-
>
One more datapoint...the default i386 kernel in Debian now is PAE.
Peace,
Greg