18 Apr
2013
18 Apr
'13
12:04 p.m.
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 01:54:25 +0200
Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz> wrote:
Hello everyone,
you might also be interested in:
http://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/a-memory-comparison-of-light-linux-de…
http://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/a-memory-comparison-of-light-linux-de…
It surprised me Razor-qt. I have to say that this environment is not
nearly as complete and comprehensive as Trinity, but memory
consumption is staggering. That would be a consequence of using Qt4?
The choice to remain in Trinity with Qt3 => TQt3 seems to be a very
good decision.
Slavek
I have obtained pretty much the same test results while struggling to
find a TDE alternative(s) using a "features / resource consumption"
scale. I saw no competition between the TDE and Razor-Qt, because of the
reasons you have mentioned. As the time passes new actively developed
projects like Razor-Qt tend to grow larger, not smaller, so I assume
the gap will only widen in the future.
It's still too early to guess, but I (wish|expect) to see E17 as a major
rival of TDE in 3-4 years from now.
Regards,
Sergey.