On Monday 30 April 2018 07:36:14 deloptes wrote:
William Morder wrote:
On the Devuan pages, there is a sort of sub-group
who want to stop
using dbus. Just like they want to get rid of systemd, so they also
don't like dbus.
I don't know anything more about it, but perhaps you could look into
this?
So there are some extremists :) Is it turning into Debian-Amish
community :D
without dbus, also bluetooth won't work ... and many other things
regards
I will stand in defense of dbus. It and its predecessors have helped to
automate my email handling to a minimum amount of work for me. With its
help, an incoming msg, being written to /var/mail/$usr by procmail, is
available for me to take action in kmail appriximately .25 seconds after
procmail has closed the file. Losing dbus would multiply the needed
mouse clicks by 2 or more, and add me as a variable delay to its
visibility in kmail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional
commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read
list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to
top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
--
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>