On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, William Morder via tde-users
wrote:
Better not to give in to conspiracy-theory
thinking here. I believe a
simpler proportion is at work.
The more money, property or power is involved, the greater the degree of
corruption. Who was it that said it? Lord Acton? "Power corrupts.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Corruption creeps in by small degrees. It starts with somebody offering
front-row seats at some special, exclusive event, or just being given
"free money" or other unearned bonuses and perks.
In all this technophobic conspiracy thinking, there is a simpler
principle at work. People who are in business want to know who are their
customers. (It makes more sense in a small business, where we meet in
person.) When we move into situations where the people in business never
actually meet most of their customers, they must find other ways to get
to "know" them. At first, I'm sure, they mean well, and only want to
serve the needs and wants of people who buy or use their goods and
services; but as the company and customer base grows, and as competition
also increases, then comes the need for greater control.
And now, we the users are not even really exactly "customers" or
"clients", but just use what we get for free; and because it's free, of
course, we are taught that we should not complain or make demands, but
just be grateful.
In the end, we, the customers, users, renters (whatever our situation)
become the least important part; in fact, an obstacle to doing business.
What the business person would prefer, really, is just to withdraw money
directly from our accounts, without any interaction from ourselves. But
this is only because doing business in person is becoming a rare occasion
any more.
Bill
there may be truth in some of this but it seems a bit like
thread-drift - perhaps retraction of apfelstrüdel must be considered;
how does this relate to systemd-homed?
it seems systemd-homed brings precisely the benefit which Kate
mentioned is lacking in our usual way of moving 'home'; she wrote:
"I don't understand why this is even needed?! I can already move home
directories without a problem. Been doing it for years. I just make
sure to use the same user on the same distro, same etc. Works
perfectly. Or I save key settings (konq bookmarks, FF bms, etc) it's
so easy after that to just retheme to spec."
I take it with systemd-homed one doesn't get trapped by shifting UIDs
and such. they write (partial quotation),
"Linux assigns UIDs in the order usernames are registered on a
machine. you may get UID 1000 if you are the first user on a laptop
and you could get 1001 on another laptop if you are the second user to
be registered there. This poses a problem if you move a home directory
container from machine A where you're UID 1000 to machine B where you
are 1001. systemd-homed solves this by doing a chown -R on the entire
home directory if there is a conflict. [...]"
I once fell athwart of that! not to mention that 'home' gets encrypted.
why isn't this a net bonus?
f.
But isn't the UID/GID sync issue handled by other, already existing
mechanisms? NIS and LDAP come to mind.