On 7/3/24 12:31 PM, CHRIS M via tde-users wrote:
I gave an HONEST answer to Riley, I can't help
that you took it the
wrong way. That's the whole point is to take everyones input and
thoughts on how to keep TDE alive. There's nothing wrong with INPUT,
without input, TDE would prob shrivel up and cease to exist.
I've been online for close to 40 years. Before that I managed long
distance conversations with dead trees and pens. I worked a few decades
as a technical writer. Conversing through the written word is
challenging and requires patience. Add different backgrounds, cultures,
languages, etc., and these conversations grow more challenging,
requiring more patience.
I think the TDE community is sufficiently active to keep TDE alive for a
long time. The MATE, Xfce, Cinnamon, and Enlightenment communities are
similar. Then there are all of the many window managers that have been
around since the 1980s and 1990s. TDE is doing fine, but I agree that
meaningful conversation is needed in any relationship.
I just thought it would be nice to have newer version
of software, It
doesn't have to be the PLASMA VERSION of apps, But at least advance SOME
apps to version 2.x +, but keep KDE the 3.5.x base.
With a limited number of developers, the best that mortal users can do
is ask questions and file feature requests. I think a big challenge is
many TDE users are "traditional desktop" users and do not need or want
many so-called modern features. For example, I do not use gmail, social
media, online streaming services, company email, etc. I refuse to own a
smart phone. What many people might consider missing features are mostly
shoulder shrugs for me.
Conversely, I'm a dinosaur and many young people today don't give a hoot
what I don't need or want. Many such users seldom use an actual PC. For
many people, smart phones are their soma and when they use PCs they
expect a similar experience. So grumpy old men like me are irrelevant,
but I think many TDE users want a traditional desktop experience and are
not much motivated by the "latest and greatest."
I use KDE 5 and TDE, but I spent much time configuring KDE and TDE to
act like a traditional desktop with few bells and whistles. Lots of
features disabled, removing unnecessary packages, etc. Many people would
find my desktop configuration boring. I don't use window managers
because of the additional effort required to create a comfortable look
and feel. A basic DE avoids those efforts.
My point is wanting new "modern" features is going to happen only if
there are motivated developers. A low number of developers and users
does not mean TDE is dead, just that TDE is kind of like that proverbial
old pair of jeans that just fit and are comfortable.