17 Aug
2017
17 Aug
'17
4:52 a.m.
Not sure I follow this thread..but here goes.
1. I don't understand the op's first post comment re: applied patches &
resulting failure? I do not use Red Hat so don't know the reference.
2. The vendor NVIDIA drivers have been the canonical driver and setup
for my quadro cards...by far.
3. glx -SGI is the library, I think Mesa with origins from SGI,
/usr/lib/xxx;
libglx.so is my Nvidia library../usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so
hth
Greg M
On 08/14/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:12 PM, dep
<dep(a)drippingwithirony.com> wrote:
said Peter Laws:
former, you may not be using the Nvidia driver at
all. Open a terminal and
enter "glxinfo" and then scroll back to the top and see if it sheds any
light. It should begin something like this:
name of display: :0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
server glx version string: 1.4
I do not believe that a framebuffer device supports direct rendering.
Well, here's my problem - it's not a Dell, it's an Indy! (or an Onyx
or an ... gah, can't remember what the other SGIs were called).
name of display: :0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.4
WTH?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting