17 Oct
2014
17 Oct
'14
10:31 p.m.
Unlike you I am not in the least worried about the
width. What bothers me
is
the clarity and legibility. And the original version
is much better. Much
better contrast and fewer colours that add no functionality at all. (That
unnecessary blue stripe that necessitates changing the colour of the
writing
so that the two stripes are different colours instead
of uniform. Tiring
and
harder to read.)
That "blue stripe" is a GTK theme and has nothing to do with the webpage.
There is nothing on the webpage that is not on the original webpage. There
is no change in content, colours, or anything else on the webpage at all.
The only thing that was adjusted was the capacity to suit many screen sizes
and this was done in the css by using percentages instead of fixed widths.
There is no reason for you to change any font colour because of that "blue
stripe".
On 18 October 2014 09:06, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2014 22:30:55 Michael . wrote:
Take a look at the shots from my laptop and see
that there is absolutely
no difference in width for any of it and only 1 text line deference in
height in the menu but not in the rest of the content.
Unlike you I am not in the least worried about the width. What bothers me
is
the clarity and legibility. And the original version is much better. Much
better contrast and fewer colours that add no functionality at all. (That
unnecessary blue stripe that necessitates changing the colour of the
writing
so that the two stripes are different colours instead of uniform. Tiring
and
harder to read.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting