Anno domini 2021 Sun, 21 Feb 17:20:13 +0100
Slávek Banko via tde-users scripsit:
[...]
I researched the possibilities here. According to the current law, we have
an option called "spolek" or "zapsanĂ˝ spolek" ("registered
association" -
allowed abbreviation "z.s."). It is an association of three or more
persons, which has its own statutes and acts as a legal entity. The
members of the association are not liable for its debts.
I also researched what the account management options are here. The local
bank Fio.cz provides a Transparent Account. Such an account allows free
viewing of transactions on the account. Account management and operations
fees are minimal - basically the only fee is for payment outside the EU.
Sounds good for me. It's just the ame as "Verein" in Austria.
Again, I ask for your observations and comments.
Currently the basic questions I see:
1) Do we want to try to address the SF Conservancy, even if it means being
bound by US law?
No sane person should do that.
2) If so, but SF Conservancy rejects us, do we want to
become a member of
the Open Source Collective?
3) If we want to avoid US law, do we want to continue as unregistered -
only as a virtual team with Open Collective Europe?
4) Or we don't want any of the above - do we want our own legal entity?
ad 4: +1 for that. Let's stand on our own feet.
Nik
Thank you!
Cheers
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA,
CIA ...