How common is it to want to invoke the screensaver
sometimes with locking
and sometimes without locking, on the same computer? If you never use
locking, can you not still configure the screensaver to not lock, and then
use the same Ctrl+Alt+L ? Or does Ctrl+Alt+L now cause locking, even if
the screensaver was configured to not lock?
Thanks-
Douglas
-----Original Message-----
From: Sl�vek Banko [mailto:slavek.banko@axis.cz]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:37 PM
To: trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Subject: Re: [trinity-users] kmail 3.5.13.2
On Tuesday 21 of May 2013 00:24:38 Serghei Amelian wrote:
On Tuesday 21 May 2013 01:19:43 Timothy Pearson
wrote:
[...]
I was unaware of the Ctrl+Alt+S conflict when I
introduced the global
shortcut to activate the screensaver. If desired, I can change the
screensaver activation sequence to something else, but I would need
help finding an intuitive and non-conflicting shortcut to change it to!
Tim
Maybe Ctrl+ScrLk ?
Scroll Lock might be a little confusing, because Ctrl+Alt+S == screen saver
only runs without locking. To lock is used Ctrl+Alt+L.
Slavek
I myself often use in different cases both options.
Yes, Ctrl+Alt+L causes locking, even if the
screensaver was configured to not lock.
Slavek
--