Re: [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] Re: [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] Re: [trinity-users] kmail forever indexing is back

On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:10:01 -0700 (MST) "Marvin Jones via trinity-users" trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net wrote:

I realize it's not very thoughtful and caring of me, but I was hoping this would go on long enough to see just how long

Subject : Re: [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] Re: [trinity-users] Re: [BULK] Re: [trinity-users] kmail forever indexing is back

  could grow before we saw some breakage somewhere.  :-)

Well, the relevant standard (RFC 5322 section 2.1.1) stipulates that an email header must be no more than 998 ASCII characters in length, so if something were going to break, I'd bet it would happen around there.

E. Liddell