22 Jul
2012
22 Jul
'12
12:52 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2012 12:40 PM, <=K wrote:
Nah they just owe it to having source code available.
The BSDs are
an example.. none of your philosophical freedom talk there, but
they exist. GPL is just better because the dervative works also
have source available. No elitist attitude necessary.
That's still wrong. You aren't thinking clearly. The availability of
source code is utterly and completely useless unless you have the
unrestricted freedom to use, study, modify, and redistribute.
Apart from one old and deprecated version, all BSD licenses are free
software licenses. They predate the term "open source." You aren't
providing an argument against my argument. You are just repeating my
argument back to me. Those projects owe their existence to their
freedom, not the term "open source."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQC07lAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEIQNgH/2s1N8Cn7mKmjT3JrKftMe1e
LToikGHkiVRuGdgLaYq5fWiNyXMr+hEI+m1pxxeg5VYFLGmX380ugTaod6HScxhA
Xp8LI82KbE7iZ7GqzJGOsdhmpBHjAhwC+8Ddo1tAeG15kYpl5kSyN3hPoeRRFXJR
nPi+EEx63MYN2+vs/n1M9uATbeu+Ft8Tv0fEndPeF4lfRcm17iLOg/loQk9XFUu+
9pWimxdTxRHkeI6vyLcVcZhMRVNY/nCfLw7//YYScXkuK1zVbCUuvx8RUVXOmoZn
+WfY80ABBh7/4VMMLw8plNtYTpXy7KybqeBB8fEv3oLW3kC3E3GZxGX143y1c8A=
=o7FU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----