Trinity must truly be part of the .1% because 99.9% of web users have screen resolutions at least width of 1024
On 16 October 2014 14:38, Gerhard Zintel gerhard.zintel@mrs-thomas.de wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2014, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I could see the benefit for wide screens though. I do not know if
there is
a possibility to say "not bigger than max width" but reformat if
screen is
smaller. Might be a compromize.
Of course there is a way to do it. It is standard CSS and is relatively
easy to apply using media queries. Knowing that this is not only
possible,
but pretty easy, do you still disagree with the functionality of fixed width sites? The whole purpose of 'responsive designs' is so that one
site
can be used across many devices with only some changes to css.
My comment was triggered by looking at your mentioned example
I'm not happy with those kind of sites using with smaller screens. I totally agree that having a maximum width could be of benefit depending on the content. But it should reformat at smaller sizes. If this is possible I'm fully satisfied.
Gerhard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting