everything kde4 is no more :
* fast and user friendly * stable and mostly bug-free * pretty good configuration for most everything useful * will never use up al of your ram like kde4 * systemd-free * well maintained, good community * many power user useful features that disappeared from kde4( i cant live without konsole 3 features that disappeared from kde4).
I d also say that the trinity fork started after the first ( officialy stable / final ) kde4 release were complete disasters, full of bugs, crashes and user unfriendly choices ), that prooved the new kde team was nothing professional and had no respect for users, pushing as stable/final release some stuff that wasnt even worth an alpha version.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Lisi Reisz lisi.reisz@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2015 17:57:46 Lisi Reisz wrote:
I am shortly giving a talk on TDE. Any points that people particularly think I should mention? In fact, any pointers?
Thank you very much to all who have replied so far! I am known for being a strong proponent of TDE, which is why I have been asked to do this, and I want to do it justice.
We all use such different aspects of it! What was that I said about its being flexible?? :-)
It is a tool. A great tool. It helps, instead of getting in the way. And as Nik said it has such wonderful applications.
Amarok is still a front runner, and as for K3b, which Nik mentioned, on the day I switched full-time to Linux, K3b was the main reason. I was dual booting at the time, and burning a fair number of CDs. I got fed up with rebooting in order to use K3b instead of Nero, so I took a deep breath, and stayed in Linux.
Lisi
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting