On 14/01/2012 21:41, Timothy Pearson wrote:
On Saturday 14 January 2012 10:22:22 am Dan Youngquist wrote:
On 01/14/2012 10:38 AM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
This bug is fixed in git. It was a libart issue.
Will be there in R14
I have the same problem on 2 different machines -- the only 2
installs
of
3.5.13 I've done so far -- and it's been reported on the list at least
twice since then. So I think it must be a common problem that lots of
folks run into. I haven't tried the patch yet, but am about to do so.
But most who get to the website, install Trinity, and have this problem
won't know there's a patch -- they'll just see a great big bug that's
still
there, and uninstall Trinity and never try it again. So I think it's a
really bad idea to leave it unfixed until R14.
The OP was building from source on
a Wheezy system, this IS different than
a user
visiting the TDE website& installing the binaries on a Wheezy system.
AFAIK, TDE3.5.13 is compiled on a Squeeze box, for the Debian stuff, and I
would
not expect them to necessarily work 100% on Wheezy. The install
instructions are
for Lenny& Squeeze.
I have tested TDE3..5..13& Wheezy in a Vbox instance and would not want
to use on
my production boxes.
Caveat, I don't think running a Wheezy guest on a Squeeze host is a valid
test
though. To many kernel& Xorg cahnges, to name a few, some stuff just
won't
work.
My experience with Wheezy in a full VM has been terrible. Too much
instability in core system libs--I strongly recommend that TDE users DO
NOT UPGRADE TO WHEEZY unless they are prepared to lose access to TDE (and
other software packages) until Wheezy is marked as stable.
I'm a little confused now so please bear with me, or just ignore me as
you choose :)
I'm not at all sure where libart comes into my equation. I have
libart-2.0-2 & libart-2.0-dev installed on my system, as debs, but not
libart-lgpl. Nor does libart-lgpl appear in the stable sources, except
as an almost empty sub-folder of konstruct/libs or in apt on either
Squeeze or Wheezy.
So, as a layman, what am I missing? I did say I was confused.
From a Wheezy point of view, yes, it's not marked as stable, but
waiting for debian stable is like waiting for a bus on a Sunday.
Besides, having experienced this build from source of 3.5.13, being
marked as stable doesn't mean it really is stable. No insult or slight
intended :)
Cheers,
Mike.
--