5 Dec
2010
5 Dec
'10
8:13 p.m.
Interesting. Going forward, is it then benefical to stic to Qt3 then?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net
wrote:
On Fri, Dec
03, 2010 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Tiago Marques wrote:
So one question comes to mind: why qt4 apps with the
same or less
end-user functional as qt3-apps consume much more resources then, again,
qt3-ones in case of kde4?
Qt4 seems to encourage sloppy (slow/memory intensive) coding for some
reason. Also, Qt4 lacks many functions that Qt3 offered, leaving
programmers to try to re-implement them. I have found that many of these
re-implementations are less efficient than the original internal Qt3 code
was, partially due to unexposed internal Qt variables.
Just my $0.02.
Tim
From the
little I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were
not
more heavyweight themselves.