On Monday 12 September 2011 20:07:02 John A. Sullivan
III wrote:
Sorry but as much as there are all kinds of
technical and security
reasons why this should not be done (which I wholeheartedly embrance and
which is why KDE resisted for so long), the business case is
overwhelming. Â KMail is a non-starter without it in many environments -
sure, but why the heck should it (especially the kde 3.5.x version) be
a 'starter' in an ms-outlook-crap dominated environment ?
makes no sense, IMHO.
those who want/need things like that, for whatever reason, are surely
better
off with kde 4.x (which has even more 'ms-features' anyways)
werner
We aim to provide our users with what they want. Philosophically there is
no problem with adding HTML support (through an as-of-yet unknown
technical means ;-))--in the TDE style of doing things there would be a
configuration option to shut off the HTML reply feature.
Also, I would be careful about bashing Microsoft in terms of the features
offered. While I do not like Micro$oft, and I absolutely hate what they
did to Windows over the past couple of releases, Windows 2000 and XP were
workhorse operating systems that still do things that Linux can't.
Tim