On 5/20/24 5:04 PM, deloptes via tde-users wrote:
but this is not factually correct as it is a fork.
I did not mean to deny the fork, only to not emphasize. :) Such as with
press releases.
My idea is eluding click-bait authors into not emphasizing the original
fork. They seldom do that with MATE. MATE is treated as standing on its
own. TDE is still treated like the proverbial red-headed step child.
I am hardly surprised when these authors rant about perceived missing
features and then dismiss the entire project. After all, look at the
author's profile byline and notice the "I am cool because I wear
sunglasses" picture. My sunglasses mean I am smart and you're not.
Something about baby and bath water or letting perfect being the enemy
of good. Still the same argument -- not shiny -- meh.
Sometimes I like being a grumpy old man. :)