14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
5:45 p.m.
On Monday 14 November 2011 2:37:44 am Laurent Dard wrote:
Le 14/11/2011 02:41, Greg Madden a écrit :
Following is what Debian Squeeze, or apt-cache policy, thinks about versioning.
Should there be both the 3:33:3.3.8d 3:3.3.8-d in the repos at this time? When I
do an 'update' on my system, 3:3.3.8-d always wants to be installed ...again. I
have put 3:3.3.8-d on hold as a work around, just wondering if both opies of the
package need to be in the repos.
$ apt-cache policy libqt3-mt
libqt3-mt:
Installed: 3:3.3.8d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze
Candidate: 3:3.3.8-d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze
Version table:
3:3.3.8-d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze 0
500 file:/pub/ TDE_3.5.13/ Packages
*** 3:3.3.8d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze 0
500
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-v3.5.13/debian/
squeeze/main amd64 Packages
500
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-v3.5.13/ubuntu/
squeeze/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3:3.3.8b-7+b1 0
990 http://192.168.0.4/debian/ squeeze/main amd64 Packages
--
Peace,
Greg
Thanks for the script, not something I would
figure out myself.
Thanks for the feedback.
I have used it successfully on three 3.5..13
machines here, though they
were running okay.
If we had kept "3:3.3.8-d-" versions installed, it would have been okay to
run trinity now but we would have been unable to upgrade in the future
(until qt >= "3:3.3.9").
(The tricky thing I understood is that dpkg considers that "3:3.3.8b" is a
greater version than "3:3.3.8-d" BUT it also considers that
"3:3.3.8-d-" is
greater than "3:3.3.8d", "3:3.3.8e" and so on.)