28 Aug
2016
28 Aug
'16
12:02 a.m.
On Saturday 27 August 2016 19:30:46 Slávek Banko wrote:
On Sunday 28 of August 2016 01:17:45 Gene Heskett
wrote:
I can't argue that point Slávek. OTOH, what can you do to it that is not
already done so well that it Just Works(TM)? The last attack it might
have succumbed to had the whole Mary Ann rebuilt to guard against it in
something on the order of 36 hours, 2+ years ago. That included the
install bin's for several hundred routers. So BrainSlayer moved at more
than adequate speed IMO when the money and reputation was on the table.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
dd-wrt may have additional bells and whistles.
It seems to need a
$70 router to have the resources to do port forwarding, customized
iptables rules and such. However, it has worked so well for me that
I have not had the urge to try some of the $30 routers. Competition
generally leads to a better, cheaper product.
The new user would be wise to survey what is available, and for how
much. But first learn the lingo well enough to determine if you need
feature such and such. dd-wrt is the only one I trust to not have a
back door in it. Someone else will have to attest for openwrt, and
tomato as I have exactly zero experience with them.
I've also previously used the dd-wrt, but after I get to know better
OpenWRT, it became my first choice. Part of flash is available as a
regular filesystem. Is there a proper packaging system. In short, much
more versatile than dd-wrt.
Anyway, when I last looked at the dd-wrt pages, so it seemed to me
that the development already stagnant for some time.