[tde-users] Re: TDE's Backstory and purpose

said Chris M via tde-users: Reddit. Really? KDE was once very good. It was always under attack, because Qt, then because the right people didn't back it, then because Gnome. But it was the first decent Linux desktop, and it worked. When KDE-4 came out, it sucked. And the KDE boys became defensive, downright nasty in fact about it. (To this day, if you point out some KDE thing that doesn't work, the response is always "I don't see you writing something better." To wit the mess that is Plasma Bigscreen, which has been in development for four years and still can't do anything anyone would want done.) To excuse their own shortcomings, they attack everything else. Modern KDE goes out of its way to make things more complicated than they need to be. Consider the difference between putting an application on Kicker in TDE -- drag it there -- and modern KDE, which involved multiple steps, success is not assured, and it it possible to lose their kickerish thing entirely in the process. Anyone who thinks security has *anything* to do with the desktop being run really should stay away from computers. -- dep