15 Sep
2011
15 Sep
'11
3:43 p.m.
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:17:58 Bimal Rekhadiya
wrote:
Don't worry, the current sites are here to stay, for many of the reasons
you outlined above! :-)
Bimal, if you truly want to help the project, you could roll up your
sleeves and start working on fixing some of the bug reports at
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net. I am sure there are also translations
into your native tongue that need fixing. Otherwise, it is just an
instance of majoring on the minors, and of taking something perfectly good
and breaking it just for the sake of doing something.
Tim
Yes sure.. Here are some links of my work:
http://www.brcreation.com/
http://www.kallina.eu/
http://www.jareddurrant.com/
and so many..
These sites are fully developed by me.. I have designed layout and than
converted to Wordpress Theme and than created full working website.
Personally, I have looked at all three and I strongly dislike all three.
They
are exclusive not inclusive (i.e. not accessoble to the handicapped), do
not
follow web standards (don't work with Konqueror, my usual and preferred
browser - ironic for sites that are proposed as suitable for Konqueror's
main
home) and are far too glitzy.
Others may, in fact probably will, disagree. But your work is certainly
not
good enough for you to announce that you are highhandedly going to
redesign 2
perfectly good, useful and usable sites and render them unusable. KDE 4
is
about glitz and glitter. Your sites might suit it. But KDE 3 is about
functionality, configurability and usability. As are the present sites.
Which are also pleasant to look at. Your sites hurt my eyes.
Why do we have to have our sites mucked up because you want to use TDE??
Please don't let us render Trinity into a toy for the young and flashy.
Sorry to be so assertive: but you don't take hints.
Lisi