On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, William Morder via tde-users
wrote:
Better not to give in to conspiracy-theory
thinking here. I believe a
simpler proportion is at work.
The more money, property or power is involved, the greater the degree
of corruption. Who was it that said it? Lord Acton? "Power corrupts.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Corruption creeps in by small degrees. It starts with somebody offering
front-row seats at some special, exclusive event, or just being given
"free money" or other unearned bonuses and perks.
In all this technophobic conspiracy thinking, there is a simpler
principle at work. People who are in business want to know who are
their customers. (It makes more sense in a small business, where we
meet in person.) When we move into situations where the people in
business never actually meet most of their customers, they must find
other ways to get to "know" them. At first, I'm sure, they mean well,
and only want to serve the needs and wants of people who buy or use
their goods and services; but as the company and customer base grows,
and as competition also increases, then comes the need for greater
control.
And now, we the users are not even really exactly "customers" or
"clients", but just use what we get for free; and because it's free, of
course, we are taught that we should not complain or make demands, but
just be grateful.
In the end, we, the customers, users, renters (whatever our situation)
become the least important part; in fact, an obstacle to doing
business. What the business person would prefer, really, is just to
withdraw money directly from our accounts, without any interaction from
ourselves. But this is only because doing business in person is
becoming a rare occasion any more.
Bill
there may be truth in some of this but it seems a bit like
thread-drift - perhaps retraction of apfelstrüdel must be considered;
how does this relate to systemd-homed?
it seems systemd-homed brings precisely the benefit which Kate
mentioned is lacking in our usual way of moving 'home'; she wrote:
"I don't understand why this is even needed?! I can already move home
directories without a problem. Been doing it for years. I just make
sure to use the same user on the same distro, same etc. Works
perfectly. Or I save key settings (konq bookmarks, FF bms, etc) it's
so easy after that to just retheme to spec."
I take it with systemd-homed one doesn't get trapped by shifting UIDs
and such. they write (partial quotation),
"Linux assigns UIDs in the order usernames are registered on a
machine. you may get UID 1000 if you are the first user on a laptop
and you could get 1001 on another laptop if you are the second user to
be registered there. This poses a problem if you move a home directory
container from machine A where you're UID 1000 to machine B where you
are 1001. systemd-homed solves this by doing a chown -R on the entire
home directory if there is a conflict. [...]"
I once fell athwart of that! not to mention that 'home' gets encrypted.
why isn't this a net bonus?
There are hords of resons.
1) security relies on trust into the computer you plug your home in. Well,
that's a bad plan to begin with. System is compromised, sor your home is
now compromised, too. And becaus of the ease to do, you compromomise all
systems you go to that day and the next day ... 2) TRhis problem was solved
when? 40 years ago? When was it, NFS+yellowpages was introduced? 3) It does
not address at all the problems of different hardware and different OS. You
can share your home on any *nix system you like - if you are a bit coutious
- without systemd-homed. You cannot any more when you use systemd-homed. 4)
WTF encrypted JSON? This is soooo systemd. Remember the "benefits" of
binary logfiles? 5) "systemd-homed" looks more like "systemd-owned"
than
anything else.
Nik