tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

3 participants
3839 discussions

Strange behavior when building kdelibs 3.5.13
by Darrell Anderson 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

I am running a full pass of my build scripts to ensure they function as expected. This time kdelibs failed to build. Looking at the build log revealed the same strange error I saw when initially trying to build kdevelop about not finding tqt.h. With kdevelop I was instructed to run an on-the-fly patch of the CMakeLists.txt files in the package to change TQT_INCLUDE_DIRS to TQT_INCLUDEDIR. I created the same type of patch for kdelibs and kdelibs then built without error. Why did this suddenly happen when during my first run at building packages I never had any such error with kdelibs? Does this kdelibs patch make sense? If so, why? Thanks. Darrell

1 0

libltdl missing from arts
by L0ner sh4dou 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

While compiling trinity manually on arch I discovered that libltdl was removed from arts source tree. I got errors both on CMake configuration stage (http://paste.pocoo.org/raw/506509/) as on compilation stage (http://paste.pocoo.org/raw/504813/). Luckily i found on my HDD trinity code I pulled just before version froze and which I thought I deleted. After putting the missing libltdl dir into current arts dir both CMake configuration and compilation went without errors. Apparently libltdl from arts is not quite the same thing that is available in package form in most distributions main repos. As it is said in arts libltdl readme it has been slightly modified to make it work with KDE. As for now it should be put back in the arts, since miss of it prevents arts compilation. Whole missing thing compressed: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26010362/libltdl.tar.gz

2 6

Re: [trinity-users] Re: OSS support ?
by Francois Andriot 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

Le 12/11/2011 12:21, Nick Leverton a écrit : > In article<4EBDC181.8080905(a)free.fr>, > Francois Andriot<trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> wrote: >> Le 10/11/2011 17:02, Philippe Bourdeu d'Aguerre a écrit : >>> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2011, François ANDRIOT a écrit : >>> Yes. The choice is only "Automatic", "Nothing" and "Alsa". With KDE 3.5.10, I >>> get also "OSS" and a few others. >> Hello, >> I've just compiled an ARTS version for RHEL5 which should support OSS >> and Threaded-OSS. >> As I thought, it was just forgotten in the CMAKE port, but all the code >> is still in place, it was just not compiled. > Could you post the change, please ? It would help me too. > > Thanks, > > Nick Hello, first, I send a copy of the mail to 'trinity-devel' since it's not really an user question. You will find the patch I made attached with this mail. There is one drawback (I think), it's that I've hardcoded the following line in 'config.h.cmake': #define HAVE_IOCTL_INT_ULONGINT_DOTS 3 This value was guessed automatically when using autotools, but I did not find how to replace it with a CMAKE equivalent. The rest of the patch should be sane. Also, I did not test OSS at all, so I don't even know if it works. Francois Andriot

1 0

kdebindings 3.5.13: embedviewimp.h build errors
by Darrell Anderson 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

Slackware 13.1 Previously built kdebindings without this error. I don't know what is different this time around. Log: http://humanreadable.nfshost.com/trinity/build_logs/kdebindings-3.5.13-i486… The log also says the following: Detected TQt3... ... checking if TQt is available... no configure: WARNING: You are attempting to compile Trinity without the Trinity Qt Interface installed. Please install libtqtinterface-dev and try again! tqtinterface is installed. I don't know what this error messages keys on, but the phrase "Please install libtqtinterface-dev and try again!" seems Debian specific. Need help. :) Darrell

3 5

Changing list subscription
by Darrell Anderson 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

Is there a way to change my email address in this list? Or do I have to subscribe with a different address and unsubscribe the current one? Darrell

2 1

Re: [trinity-devel] Need official clarification
by Timothy Pearson 12 Nov '11

12 Nov '11

> Does Trinity team want a role of an upstream for KDE3? Yes we do, but at the same time we do not want to be saddled with the KDE name. If we were to remain "KDE3", instead of rebranding to TDE, we would forever remain in the shadow of KDE4 (and KDE5 when it comes out, etc.). As stated on one of our pages, we aim to keep the spirit of the old KDE3 interface alive, but will gladly accept innovation within the established interface style. For example, while we have no desire to copy Plasma or other similar features from KDE4, a new program that makes it easy to configure and control monitors was included in the TDE source; user visible changes were made to bring the desktop lock system up to modern standards, etc. We are not against change in general, we simply ask that the user is given as much information as possible about (and tight control over) the task at hand. I have definite theories on interface design involving how to maximize I/O to and from the slowest link in the system: the human operator. So far these theories line up exactly with the TDE interface (with some exceptions of course, but these are being rectified). As long as the new feature being added does not collide with these theories, chances are it will be welcomed with open arms. Also, if it does collide I am more than willing to explain why I would consider it to be suboptimal. > Is seems that as you claim Trinity is a totally new product you do not want such role. We do actually. Trinity is an exciting new development of KDE3, it has KDE3 roots, and it is the most likely candidate for upgrade from an existing KDE3 system. We simply do not want to continually live in KDE's shadow, or be hampered in our efforts to improve this excellent desktop environment. > In that case I will request removal of KDE3 from the next openSUSE release. > I do not want to be attacked for including software with no upstream. From what I can tell your software does NOT have an upstream. If you were to build TDE 3.5.13 on OpenSUSE then it would. Tim

1 0

Fwd: Re: [opensuse-factory] The release notes/product highlights for 12.1
by Ilya Chernykh 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

Hi! This is an extensive objection by a KDE4 developer against marketing and promoting KDE3 and/or Trinity. I would like to see what can you say in response as it seems he expresses quite common sentiments of distributions developers towards KDE3. He also links an extensive article in German in a respectable Linux journal named "Trinity - desktop with no future ". The machine translation is here: http://translate.google.ru/translate?hl=ru&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.f…

4 6

Re: [trinity-devel] Fwd: Re: [opensuse-factory] The release notes/product highlights for 12.1
by Baron 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

On Friday 11 November 2011 17:19:01 Ilya Chernykh wrote: > Hi! > > This is an extensive objection by a KDE4 developer against marketing > and promoting KDE3 and/or Trinity. > > I would like to see what can you say in response as it seems he > expresses quite common sentiments of distributions developers towards > KDE3. > > He also links an extensive article in German in a respectable Linux > journal named "Trinity - desktop with no future ". The machine > translation is here: > > http://translate.google.ru/translate?hl=ru&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2 >Fwww.freiesmagazin.de%2Fmobil%2FfreiesMagazin-2011-09-bilder.html I could be wrong, but, I get the impression that there is the realisation by the KDE people they have made a mistake ! In doing so alienating lots of its users ! -- Best Regards: Baron. -- Best Regards: Baron. -- Best Regards: Baron.

1 0

Need official clarification
by Ilya Chernykh 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

Does Trinity team want a role of an upstream for KDE3? Is seems that as you claim Trinity is a totally new product you do not want such role. In that case I will request removal of KDE3 from the next openSUSE release. I do not want to be attacked for including software with no upstream.

1 0

kdelibs potential security vulnerability
by /dev/ammo42 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

Hello, The kdelibs/qt3 combination I built (from the stable sources) has a security hole: when the dynamic loader loads libkdecore.so, the libmng.so.1 is first searched in a directory in /tmp, which could potentially result in a local root privilege escalation if there are suid binaries which depend on kdelibs on the target system. Even without suid binaries, on a multi-user system one could gain another user's privileges by letting them load a kdelibs-using binary while a forged libmng is present in the /tmp directory (and usually can't be deleted by a regular user because of the sticky bit in /tmp). The build script I use does $ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$TMP/build-qt3/qt3/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH (actually Calvin Morrison's PKGBUILD does the same thing). Perhaps this hack has a relation with the issue, but anyway Patrick Volderking (the creator of Slackware) mentions in his old build script for Qt3 (when KDE3 was in Slackware) that building Qt3 in /tmp gives ****, and his script builds qt3 directly on $PREFIX/lib{,64}/qt (or qt3, depending on the exact script). But I'm not sure this is compatible with all distribution policies… as another means of avoiding /tmp, the gcc Slackware build scripts which use /$(mcookie) as a temporary directory. Are official binaries affected by the issue ? I don't know Debian/Red Hat building procedures at all and then I have no idea of the answer.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels