On Sunday 08 January 2012 00:11:15 Darrell Anderson wrote:
[...]
This tells the
user exactly what is being built. If
the user wants something else, he has a basis to determine
what is missing (or extra) and make the appropriate
changes.
Yes, this sounds palatable. As upstream providers we need to test
everything. Right now doing that is cumbersome.
I understand that individual packagers don't want everything enabled. I
don't either, but I am looking at this as an upstream provider and not just
a packager. We can't test everything if most of the features are disabled
by default.
Actually I do not understand the problem. If you want to check all features,
enable they.
--
Serghei