10 Sep
2010
10 Sep
'10
12:21 a.m.
I want to port moc to generate directly from tqt sources.
Any suggestions? Can be possible to using convert_qt_tqt3?
--
Serghei
10 Sep
10 Sep
12:25 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] moc -> tmoc
I want to port moc to generate directly from tqt
sources.
Any suggestions? Can be possible to using convert_qt_tqt3?
While it may be possible, I wouldn't advise it as moc is a core Qt tool
which will change from release to release. The TQT system is supposed to
sit in between the Qt public API and the Trinity codebase, not modify
existing Qt libraries or binaries.
If you would like to assist with the creation of the TQT interface itself
that would be of much greater help right now. ;-)
Thanks!
Tim
12:02 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] moc -> tmoc
On Friday 10 September 2010 03:25:25 Timothy Pearson wrote:
I see. In this case we need a little better wrapper over moc. Right now the
problem is that cmake macros must be hacked for using moc-tqt and I want to
avoid this.
I want to port
moc to generate directly from tqt sources.
Any suggestions? Can be possible to using convert_qt_tqt3?
While it may be possible, I wouldn't advise it as moc is a core Qt tool
which will change from release to release. The TQT system is supposed to
sit in between the Qt public API and the Trinity codebase, not modify
existing Qt libraries or binaries. If you would like to assist with the creation of the
TQT interface itself
that would be of much greater help right now. ;-)
For sure I will, after finishing cmake scripts for kdelibs.
Thanks!
Tim
--
Serghei
9:02 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] moc -> tmoc
On Friday 10 September 2010 15:02:08 Serghei Amelian wrote:
[...]
For moment I using a very simple script, like this:
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "Usage: tmoc <input_file> [args]"
else
input_file="$1"
shift
@TQT_REPLACE_STREAM@ "${input_file}" | @QT_MOC_EXECUTABLE@ $@
fi
--
Serghei
While it may
be possible, I wouldn't advise it as moc is a core Qt tool
which will change from release to release. The TQT system is supposed to
sit in between the Qt public API and the Trinity codebase, not modify
existing Qt libraries or binaries.
I see. In this case we need a little better wrapper over moc. Right now the
problem is that cmake macros must be hacked for using moc-tqt and I want to
avoid this.
11:04 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] moc -> tmoc
On Friday 10 September 2010 15:02:08 Serghei Amelian
wrote:
[...]
For moment I using a very simple script, like this:
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "Usage: tmoc <input_file> [args]"
else
input_file="$1"
shift
@TQT_REPLACE_STREAM@ "${input_file}" | @QT_MOC_EXECUTABLE@ $@
fi
--
Serghei
If it works then use it! You can add any needed wrapper scripts, like
this one, in parallel with the original Automake-based scripts. Just tack
on a _cmake suffix or similar to differentiate them from the existing
files. When all of Trinity has been ported to CMake the original scripts
can be removed.
Thanks!
Tim
While it
may be possible, I wouldn't advise it as moc is a core Qt
tool
which will change from release to release. The
TQT system is supposed
to
sit in between the Qt public API and the Trinity
codebase, not modify
existing Qt libraries or binaries.
I see. In this case we need a little better wrapper over moc. Right now
the
problem is that cmake macros must be hacked for using moc-tqt and I want
to
avoid this.
11 Sep
11 Sep
11:06 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] moc -> tmoc
On Saturday 11 September 2010 02:04:53 Timothy Pearson wrote:
[...]
Works in most cases, but unfortunately broke the compilation of kdebase/kdeui.
Right now i'm back to moc-tqt, I will investigate this issue later.
For moment I
using a very simple script, like this:
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "Usage: tmoc <input_file> [args]"
else
input_file="$1"
shift
@TQT_REPLACE_STREAM@ "${input_file}" | @QT_MOC_EXECUTABLE@ $@
fi
If it works then use it! You can add any needed wrapper scripts, like
this one, in parallel with the original Automake-based scripts. Just tack
on a _cmake suffix or similar to differentiate them from the existing
files.
Yes, I did.
Thanks!
Tim
--
Serghei
5298
days inactive
5299
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Serghei Amelian -
Timothy Pearson