So, I upgraded my old Ubuntu box to Maverick recently, with Trinity, of course. God bless.
But not without a few incidents. Some of the old settings were lost, especially in Kmail. And I noticed an annoying change in the shortcuts. I have many mailboxes: private, work, another work, Gmail etc. When I created them, I was required to name each one of them. So I put numbers in the names:
1 - Work
2 - Private
3 - Another work
4 - Gmail
etc.
Opening the File menu in Kmail, the item "Check Mail In >" had the letter C underlined, so I developed the habit of pressing Alt+f, c to open the "Check Mail In >" submenu with all my mail accounts. Then I would press the number of the account I wanted to check: Alt+f, c, 1 for "1 - Work". Fine. Could be better, but anyway...
That is a lot worse now. The new Kmail still has "Check Mail In >" but now it underlines the letter I. Which is bad, because "Import Messages..." also has the letter I underlined. So, instead of pressing Alt+f, c, now I am supposed to press Alt+f, i, and because the letter i matches two items in that menu, that mail account submenu does not open automatically anymore. Pressing i over and over swaps the selection from "Import Messages..." to "Check Mail In >" then back to "Import Messages..." ad infinitum. None will be selected automatically, I have to press Enter. So my procedure now is: Alt+f, i, i, Enter. Annoying.
Even worse, now pressing the account number (first character of the account name) doesn't work anymore. In other words, pressing Alt+f, i, i, Enter, 1 does not check the "1 - Work" account. I have to go another Enter... Summing up: from <Alt+f, c, 1> I had to go to <Alt+f, i, i, Enter, Enter> and that's just for the first item of the submenu. For the 5th item, it's <Alt+f, i, i, Enter, down, down, down, down, Enter>. Grrrrr...
Can we go back to the old arrangement? Please? Is it the proper place for that discussion or should I take it to the official KDE team? I suppose they only care about KDE 4 now, and they probably *prefer* the current, more cumbersome arrangement. I mean, just look at the horrible things they did to Gwenview, or Dolphin... :-\
--
Luciano ES
>>
Sorry folks,
Been sick, so I haven't been able to setup and send out the mockup of the
kmenu setup I've been working on. I'll have it out before the end of this
week.
Sorry for the delay and thank you for your patience.
Kate
I have spent some time developing a Squeeze live-cd with Trinity. Why?
Because there is nothing out there in the mainstream that I like and I
have seen no Squeeze/Trinity live-cd elsewhere yet. It is named Exe
Linux as I live beside the Exe Estuary in Devon, England.
It might be a good starting point or demonstration for anyone who is
interested but is unsure of running Trinity on Squeeze.
The result has (to the best of my knowledge) strictly GPL software. Some
custom themes, configurations and scripts are included but are
debianized, i.e. they can be removed/replaced by apt (for example extra
live-config scripts to support Trinity autologin and locale/language)
and should not conflict with Squeeze core system components
The live cd has an optional integrated installer (hacked remastersys)
for HD and a custom CLI script for USB persistent pendrive.
It is built "from scratch" using custom scripts, debbootstrap and GNU
tools (not live-helper nor remastersys) and is not a "remaster" of
anything else. The build scripts are included in the live-cd but are
experimental and, misused, could trash a running system. If you want to
try a remaster better use remastersys (and please don't request support
from remastersys forums because a hacked version is used).
Three locales/languages are built-in (US, GB and ES) No more fit the CD
without removing one.
If there is any interest I would like to make this available to Trinity
users, perhaps later in the "community downloads" section.
In the meantime the current ISO (685MB) is available here (can paste
this in a terminal):
wget -c
"http://exe-linux.fastfishwebsolutions.com/trinity/exelinux_squeeze_trinity_…"
md5sum:
wget -c
"http://exe-linux.fastfishwebsolutions.com/trinity/md5sum_exelinux_squeeze_t…"
Disclaimer: This is *not* an official Trinity project. There are
probably some bugs. There is some scrappy and probably out-of-date
documentation. Use at your own risk.
(Moving discussion of sudo-trinity to a new thread.)
On Fri January 14 2011 10:42:59 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> The reason for the third-party sudo is simply to add /opt/kde3/bin and
> friends to the built-in RPATH variable, thus allowing Trinity applications
> to be launched via "sudo <appname>", instead of "sudo
> /opt/trinity/bin/<appname>". That's the only change; if you don't trust
> me grab the source of the official sudo package and the modified one and
> run a diff between them. ;-)
$ diff -r sudo-1.7.4p4/ sudo-trinity-1.7.2p7/ | wc -l
112770
Would it be possible to have kde-core-trinity depend on sudo, and to
have sudo-trinity conflict with sudo and provide sudo?
This would allow people to retain Debian's sudo if they prefer.
--Mike Bird
Hello, all. One of the bug reasons we avoid KDE4 is the resource drain
of running Nepomuk. However, we are finding it is always starting on
our Trinity desktops. How does one prevent Nepomuk from starting?
Thanks - John
High guys. This may have been spelled out somewhere, but if so I
missed it, so please bear with me.
I've been a KDE user since 1.x which was part of SuSE v5.3. Up till
KDE4, I was always found KDE to do what I needed.
I have some questions about the future direction of KDE3:
1. Qt4 port - I saw that this is one the roadmap. Is this really
neccessary? I know that a lot of my complaints about KDE4 was the
useless revamp of the interface, but having to have both Qt3/4 libs
was also a huge pain. I'm not against a port if there are compelling
reasons for it, but I have seen no compelling reason for KDE4. It
uses more memory and space.
I have a lot of older laptops that I find KDE3 to be snappy and KDE4
to be like molassas.
2. What about the other KDE projects like KOffice? I've always made
use of KOffice instead of anything else. I find OpenOffice to be
bloated.
3. Removal of HAL in favor of udev - Is this something that is going
to affect KDE3?
4. Dependencies - I'm not sure how it is on other distros, but I've
always found SuSE/openSUSE to suffer from unneccessary dependencies.
Not everyone has a Palmpilot device, and most PIMs assume you do and
force you to install support for something you don't have. I'm not
sure how the core KDE and the other projects handle this. How is
Trinity planning to do it?
5. XOrg and KDE3 - on openSUSE 11.3, I can't setup my displays
because openSUSE removed it's config program SaX2 and I can't get XOrg
to work with my displays. Works fine in openSUSE 11.0/KDE3 because I
have SaX2. Is there an alternative for configuring displays?
Sorry if some of this is a repeat. I'm new to the list, but a
longtime KDE user.
Thanx
Hi,
I have a few questions about the Trinity project status,(part of them
seem to have been partially discussed on the list):
- Is Trinity endorsed in any way by the KDE project (except the share
of sources repository)?
- Are there original KDE3 developpers involved in Trinity development?
If so, I'd really like to know if they do it because KDE4 broke too much
things (and/or they consider a desktop environment should not break
things this way)?
- What are the long term perspectives about Trinity?
Will Trinity become something different than KDE3 or it keep it as
close as possible?
I mean, the move from KDE3 to KDE4 changed & broke a lots of things
that I used to work with since 2004. I'd really like a desktop
environment that doesn't change too much, that keeps its basis stable
(eg. themes can evolve, apps be improved, but keep it functionally the
same!).
By the end, I really think it's a matter of "respect for users": if one
changes things like KDE4 did, what do we have to think about respect
they have (or don't have) for their users? OK KDE4 is beautiful, etc.
but it's deaply another desktop environment (also deeply slow in some
particular configurations such as konsole/nvidia ships), so why should I
continue to use KDE desktops? I almost think KDE4 should have change its
name to something else OR... KDE3 should have been officially
maintained... or Trinity officially endorsed (is that the case?)!
So, what's going on?
Thank you,
Nicolas
PS: Do you have an idea about the approximate number of Trinity users?
It seems this list is always growing...
Hi,
I use Trinity on 3 machines (1×Lenny+2×Squeeze) and was surprized
installing Trinity on Squeeze:
aptitude asked me to remove the gnome package and a few others (sorry I
didn't have a copy of the aptitude messages).
The main reason was about desktop-base (initially 6.0.5) conflicting
with desktop-base-trinity (5.0.3-5).
I assume this isn't the expected behaviour since there's no reason to
remove gnome when installing trinity.
However, I don't miss gnome at all but still I am surprized.
Does this mean that there will be more and more issues when installing
trinity on systems with recent libraries in a near future?
I wonder how much trinity will evolve in parallel of kde4/gnome packages
and underlying libraries that also evolves...?
Nicolas
I hate Plymouth as much as I hate KDE4. Whatever pimp-faced form-over-function moron who decided to inflict this crap upon us obviously doesn't use encrypted hard disks. I do, so the damn thing keeps failing and forcing me to boot several times until the damn thing finally boots correctly. I am absolutely sick of it, it has to go.
But there is no 'kdm' program installed and there doesn't seem to be any for me to install in Adept Manager either. How am I going to boot into KDE3/Trinity when I finally get rid of Plymouth?
TIA
--
Luciano ES
>>
I was a happy KDE3 user for years, but recently, as part of upgrading Debian I
got KDE4. I've tried GNOME and various other desktop environments, but I
didn't find anything I liked. Recently someone debian-users mentioned trinity
on and it seems to be the desktop environment I'm looking for.
Before I try it out, I would like to know what pitfalls there are in upgrading
from KDE4 to Debian. The KDE3->KDE4 transition was a bit messy and I think
it's likely that KDE4 has messed up my old KDE3 configuration.
Has anyone else done this and what would they advise? Should I start from
scratch with a clean configuration or will it be OK to copy my existing
configuration?
Neil Youngman