Personally, as a TDE user, I would like to see a focus on making TDE more polished and more robust. What it doesn't need is feature creep. Some modern niceties, sure, but what brought us back to TDE was a great desktop manager that WORKS. I would like to see it stay that way. If CPU cycles can be freed in the process, GREAT! If not, I don't see CPU's getting any slower.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Darrell Anderson humanreadable@yahoo.comwrote:
The TDE project appears to me to be short of developers, money and other resources already. Would increasing the number of versions help with that???
We would not release two versions of Trinity. I'm seeking only a team of people to investigate what can be done to create a Trinity Light. What features can be disabled during the compiling process? Which Control Center settings can be changed? Etc.
The goal is to create a wiki article about creating Trinity Light. Who actually releases such a version is something downstream packagers and users decide.
I also often wonder whether those of us who are simply not capable of helping with the development, aren't just a millstone around the necks of those of you who contribute so much. Do you lot actually *want* users? We seem to me to add nothing other than problems!
As a close friend often would quip, those are the kinds of problems we want to have. :)
Basically, more users should mean more developers too. But if not, more users is still a good thing. :)
Darrell
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting