18 Oct
2014
18 Oct
'14
1:23 a.m.
@Timothy, if it is at all possible could you please remove the post with my
screenshots. I didn't realise that by doing so I was braking rules and
being rude.
If you or E. Liddell want a copy of the modified css I'll send it to you.
If not that's fine.
On 18 October 2014 12:21, Michael . <keltoiboy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's fine Lisi I respect your opinion, I was
just making sure you were
not confusing things that were not part of the actual web page.
On 18 October 2014 12:18, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2014 23:31:04 Michael .
wrote:
Tiring
>Unlike you I am not in the least worried
about the width. What
bothers me
is
>the clarity and legibility. And the original version is much better.
> Much better contrast and fewer colours that add no functionality at
all.
(That
unnecessary blue stripe that necessitates changing the colour of
the
writing
>so that the two stripes are different colours instead of uniform.
and
webpage.
harder to read.)
That "blue stripe" is a GTK theme and has nothing to do with the There is nothing on the webpage that is not on
the original webpage.
There
is no change in content, colours, or anything
else on the webpage at
all.
The only thing that was adjusted was the capacity
to suit many screen
sizes
and this was done in the css by using percentages
instead of fixed
widths.
There is no reason for you to change any font
colour because of that
"blue
stripe".
For whatever reason, yours renders differently from the original and I
like
the original better.
Lisi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting