Quotes from the article that were available to me:
"Note that after 2013 and release 3.5.13.2, Trinity switched its numbering
system to avoid being dismissed because of its version number alone."
The above statement is absolutely untrue, at least for me. I genuinely feel
sorry for any user that picks a desktop because of a version number, rather
than functionality.
As to functionality, TDE is faster than KDE Plasma, and actually displays
folder contents the exact way I want to see them. I don't want to see a mix
of folders and files when I am browsing the file system. Gnome seems to
have banished the use of desktop icons, forcing the end user to remember
the name of the application they want to use, so they can search for it. A
lot of desktop space is wasted and time wasted searching rather than just
clicking on what you want. And sometimes the command line for an icon
should actually be edited. In Linux, sometimes, it is important to modify
things so you can do what you want and how you want.
TDE does not lack an application search function. The only things I ever
borrow from other desktops, that works well in TDE is are 1. network
manager[1] application and 2. KDE connect.
"Trinity is included in few distributions, so the project cannot depend on
maintainers from outside the project. Instead, the project includes
downloads for images of several distributions configured to install
Trinity. These include a number of images for Debian, Devuan, Red Hat, and
Fedora. For convenience, the Long-Term Support (LTS) releases, such as
Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa), are probably the ones to choose because newer
releases may not support Trinity. In some cases, unofficial or testing
versions may also be available. Yet another alternative is to install from
source tarballs, which is the only choice for adding Trinity to an existing
installation."
This is an unclear statement, but I personally know that there are several
repositories for several distributions.
Oh wait, they added this later:
"Unless you install from source files, the installer for Trinity depends on
the distribution used."
I really don't see how making images available for several distribution
should amount to a criticism.
[1] I rarely use network manager because it has, at times, interfered with
Postfix functionality, which I use to send fail to ban notices on desktops
I have a way to remote into to administer.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:13 AM E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)warpmail.net> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:39:58 +0200
Thierry de Coulon <tcoulon(a)decoulon.ch> wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2022 15.24:45 James Leone
wrote:
Actually, reading the article I did not even find
out what Trinity
was missing (except that "modern look").
I was able to ferret out a few semi-specific complaints:
1. They couldn't find a UI for either system services or turning off
autostart bits of TDE (it's not entirely clear which they meant, or
even whether they do—or should—understand the distinction).
2. They couldn't figure out how to adjust the font size for desktop
icon captions (perhaps it needs a better label than just "Desktop"?)
3. They had unclear issues with the system tray, perhaps because
it was overpopulated.
4. The selection of *non*-TDE applications on whatever installer
or live media they used didn't match their preferences.
5. They dislike the application-names-start-with-K thing we
inherited from KDE.
1-3 are possibly actual problems, but the level of detail mostly isn't
good enough to follow up on.
E. Liddell
____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users(a)trinitydesktop.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)trinitydesktop.org
Web mail archive available at
https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@trinitydeskt…