28 Nov
2012
28 Nov
'12
1:42 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:35:42PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
There is a reason they used the Apache license and not
GPL and there
is a reason those companies contribute to OpenOffice
I dare say there is a reason. If they had chosen GPL, they would have
had a reason. Whatever licence they chose, they would have had a
reason. Does the mere existence of "a reason" make it a "bad licence"?
If so, all licences are bad.
--
Steven