On Sunday 29 April 2018 02:27:33 Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. April 2018 schrieb deloptes:
In my opinion the PGPG support in KMail is pretty
sufficient to enable
secure communication with any recipient.
Why would you bother paying for something you already have?
I ask myself if you clearly understand the concept of encrypted mails?
regards
The point of protinmail - as I see it - was an email address, that could
not be associated with a real person. But protonmail changed the initial
user authentication to require a handy or some other identifyable device,
so the main purpose is gone.
But what I miss in kamil+PGPG is an encrypted mail-subject, e.g "Subject:
[trinity-users] Re: more re. tde and qt5" beeing replaced by a random
string, which gets replaced on the receiver side with an embedded subject
from within the encrypted mail. Reason is, that a lot of users use a
subject that tells a lot about the mail content, at least enough to let it
be sorted in "interesting" or "junk".
Nik