There is a reason they used the Apache license and not GPL and there is a reason those companies contribute to OpenOffice
On 27 November 2012 20:21, Greg Madden gomadtroll@gci.net wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 13:14:41 you wrote:
On 28/11/12 08:17, Janek S. wrote:
Dnia wtorek, 27 listopada 2012, Calvin Morrison napisaĆ:
Apache suffers from a bad license
Forgive my laziness, but could you tell in a word or two what is wrong with Apache license?
One word: "nothing".
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2 http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
and,
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
-- Peace,
Greg
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting