28 Nov
2012
28 Nov
'12
1:35 a.m.
There is a reason they used the Apache license and not GPL and there
is a reason those companies contribute to OpenOffice
On 27 November 2012 20:21, Greg Madden <gomadtroll(a)gci.net> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 13:14:41 you wrote:
On 28/11/12 08:17, Janek S. wrote:
and,
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
--
Peace,
Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
Dnia wtorek, 27 listopada 2012, Calvin Morrison
napisał:
One word: "nothing".
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html Apache suffers from a bad license
Forgive my laziness, but could you tell in a word or two what is
wrong with Apache license?