On Sunday 14 April 2013 13:06:19 dep wrote:
said Alexandre Couture:
| Hi everyone!
|
| In the trinity-devel mailing list, there is a nst about keeping or
| removing the Kick-Off launcher. Here is a part of what is written:
|
| Timothy Pearson wrote:
| >> A good solution would be to 1) remove kickoff since it's unlikely
| >> that it is used, and doesn't keep in the style of trinity and port
| >> the cool features of kickoff into the original kicker panel, if there
| >> are any.
| >
| > I would need a list of any improvements in Kickoff that are not in
| > Kicker. Copious amounts of whitespace around each widget is not
| > considered an improvement. ;-) Perhaps you could gather information
| > from list members on why they use Kickoff vs. Kicker?
|
| Francois Andriot wrote:
| >Hello, I'm always using Kickoff menu instead of Kicker, so I would'nt
| >like it to be removed.
| >I currently have no problem with it.
| >
| >
| >Here are some reasons:
| >- I prefer having separate tabs for favorites/all
| >applications/Computer/History , instead of having a single huge menu
| >with many submenus.
| >- I prefer the search feature of Kickoff, which displays immediatly the
| >icon of the app I'm searching. In kicker, the search feature justs
| > grays out the directories, but I still have to browse the tree to find
| > the application I want. When the application list is very long, it is
| > still not very convenient.
| >- I like the way applications are shown in menu: a "big" icon,
| >application name written with big letters, application summary with
| >small letters. So there is no confusion between application name and
| >application summary.
| >
| >Maybe we should just ship Kickoff as a separate application, like kbfx
| > ?
|
| I have the same point of view as Francois Andriot on that and I can even
| add:
|
| -Kick-Off is as fast as though. If the program I want to launch is Gimp,
| I click on the start menu, I write ''gim'' on the keyboard and a menu
| with ''Gimp'' already highlighted appear. I just have to press enter.
| Otherwise, in the classic menu, I would have to find the ''Graphics''
| menu and I would need to read all the names of every programs in the
| list before I can see ''Gimp'' in the list. And everybody here knows
| that TDE comes with plenty of programs, so depending of what you are
| looking for, the menu can be long... We use search engines to find what
| we want on the Web, but it wouldn't be a good idea on your computer?
|
| -Having a little summary of what the programs are is much more intuitive
| than having to start it, to see what it is. It is just more simple for
| users coming from Windows.
|
| -On my little Asus EEE, with a screen resolution of 800x480, the
| Kick-off is just the right size, where on the classic start menu, often
| a sub-menu takes all the screen and many columns, and it gets just
| confusing and harder to find what you are looking for.
|
| -I just don't get the point of users telling everywhere on this mailing
| list that NOTHING should change in TDE incomparison with KDE 3.5.10 and
| every single bit should stay identical, but the Kick-Off should be
| dropped. It is the same thing with Dolphin. Those are 2 KDE3 programs,
| it is not because they also exists in KDE4 that they are evil.
|
| If the Kick-Off is to be dropped one day or another, would it be at
| least possible to implement the search feature of the classic start menu
| in a more efficient way?
|
| Just my opinion...
| -Alexandre
My opinion of Kickoff is so strong that I had to Google it to see what it
was. After having done so, I realized that it was one of the reasons I
stuck with KDE-3.x and now TDE, it being one of those "we did it because
we can" features that demonstrate that KDE was done, design-wise, in 3.x
that, in keeping with KDE's "we know what's best and you don't"
design
philosophy.
Same here.
If there is fervent support for this among TDE users,
might it best be a
separate and optional package? Then those who want it may have it and
those who don't won't need to carry it around.
This has come up before, and is clearly one of the features of KDE 4 that
Alexandre likes. But please, please, please if you do implement this in TDE,
let it be a voluntary package that can be added on later, not a default that
at best one can deinstall.
Dolphin too I think of as KDE4. Again, please if you decide that it should be
available in TDE, make it an available package, not a part of the default
installation.
(Likewise, the best I can tell entirely useless
plymouthd! Maybe somebody
wants it, but I don't and would love to learn how to cast it into the
abyss forever.)
I am not saying this because I want TDE to be frozen in time. I am more than
glad to see it developing and evolving. But these are two of the things that
I most disliked about KDE4. I use TDE because I dislike KDE4, and although
I do not dislike every available alternative, I just can't find one that I
like as much as KDE3.
I used KDE from KDE 3.1 onwards. It changed considerable over that time. But
it evolved. It wasn't thrown away with the bath water and started anew.
Lisi