26 Jul
2017
26 Jul
'17
10:12 p.m.
greetings . . .
i've about concluded that i absolutely must upgrade my linux/tde install.
i'm currently running 14.04 atop ubuntu 1204-LTS, which is at its end.
hypothetically i should be able to do use ubuntu's system upgrade tool and
all would be well in moving me from 1204 to 1404; i would not have to
reinstall everything from scratch. but no. it throws this error:
[quote]
Could not calculate the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This can be caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu
[/quote]
looking in /var/log/dist-upgrade, i find this error:
[quote
ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'The package 'kubuntu-desktop-trinity' is marked
for removal but it is in the removal blacklist.'
[/quote]
for some reason i must have added it to that blacklist, but truth be known
i do not remember having done so or even the existence of such a
blacklist, never mind how to add or delete something to or from it.
so, am wondering if there is a way around this that wouldn't (as it appears
would happen here anyway) nuke my TDE install.
am i missing something obvious? do i want to d/l and install a TDE image
and, if so, can i do an upgrade (rather than wipe and reinstall) from
that?
thanks in advance
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
26 Jul
26 Jul
11:25 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Thursday 27 of July 2017 00:12:42 dep wrote:
greetings . . .
i've about concluded that i absolutely must upgrade my linux/tde
install. i'm currently running 14.04 atop ubuntu 1204-LTS, which is at
its end. hypothetically i should be able to do use ubuntu's system
upgrade tool and all would be well in moving me from 1204 to 1404; i
would not have to reinstall everything from scratch. but no. it throws
this error: [quote]
Could not calculate the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This can be caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu
[/quote]
looking in /var/log/dist-upgrade, i find this error:
[quote
ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'The package 'kubuntu-desktop-trinity' is
marked for removal but it is in the removal blacklist.'
[/quote]
for some reason i must have added it to that blacklist, but truth be
known i do not remember having done so or even the existence of such a
blacklist, never mind how to add or delete something to or from it.
so, am wondering if there is a way around this that wouldn't (as it
appears would happen here anyway) nuke my TDE install.
am i missing something obvious? do i want to d/l and install a TDE
image and, if so, can i do an upgrade (rather than wipe and reinstall)
from that?
thanks in advance
Hi dep,
I always strictly avoided the Ubuntu tool because one of the steps it
performs is to disable all external apt sources. But this step is a very
good reason for causing conflicts during the dist-upgrade.
Instead, I use the classic Debian way == change the distribution name in
all apt sources lists and then the common procedure:
apt-get udpate
apt-get upgrade
apt-get clean
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get clean
apt-get autoremove
Cheers
--
Slávek
11:47 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| I always strictly avoided the Ubuntu tool because one of the steps it
| performs is to disable all external apt sources. But this step is a very
| good reason for causing conflicts during the dist-upgrade.
|
| Instead, I use the classic Debian way == change the distribution name in
| all apt sources lists and then the common procedure:
|
| apt-get udpate
| apt-get upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get dist-upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get autoremove
thanks very much -- that's the approach i'll take.
while i'm here -- there was talk that there was something wrong with 16.04
and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation demonstrates, i'm
not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and going only to 14.04 means i
get to do this all over again in two years. so -- have the issues with
16.04 been ironed out, or is it still to be avoided?
thanks again.
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
27 Jul
27 Jul
12:05 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400):
while i'm here -- there was talk that there was
something wrong with 16.04
and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation demonstrates, i'm
not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and going only to 14.04 means i
get to do this all over again in two years. so -- have the issues with
16.04 been ironed out, or is it still to be avoided?
Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading from a
mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which Ubuntu is based
anyway?
Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble to a
minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first.
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
12:26 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Felix Miata:
| dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400):
| > while i'm here -- there was talk that there was something wrong with
| > 16.04 and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation
| > demonstrates, i'm not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and going
| > only to 14.04 means i get to do this all over again in two years. so
| > -- have the issues with 16.04 been ironed out, or is it still to be
| > avoided?
|
| Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading
| from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
no, i'm not. if that is an issue that stops the show, then i'll do 14.04LTS
and hope for something happier by 18.04LTS.
| What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which Ubuntu
| is based anyway?
in my case, the fact that i'm using it, and unless i'm much mistaken (a
distinct possibility, maybe a probability), changing sources to debian and
giving it the dist-upgrade command would produce surprises of a kind i'm
hoping to avoid.
| Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble to
| a minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first.
this is what i'm trying to find out, from someone more familiar with it
than i am -- i used to keep current on all this stuff but simply lack the
time for it anymore. hence discovering i've reached the point where my
12.04LTS has expired and i need to tend to it. (i am certain that i've
never gone 5 years without upgrading my OS anymore -- i remember covering
the rollout of new versions of OS/2 in new york so as to get the new
release earliest, and going from office to office in armonk until i found
someone with a copy of 2.0 when the initial all-IBM release came. then, we
*had* to keep backups of everything because there were several issues the
lone cure to which was the dreaded rf/ri -- reformat, reinstall. which i
am here kinda hoping to avoid.)
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
12:34 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Thursday 27 of July 2017 02:05:07 Felix Miata wrote:
dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400):
On my test machine, I have encountered substantial problems when updating
14.04 => 16.04. The network was not running, NIS was not working ... it
was not good. The only function I've found is to update through all the
versions in between 14.04 => 14.10 => 15.04 => 15.10 => 16.04.
It was terrible, but otherwise I did not have a properly functioning
system. Therefore I definitely do not recommend updating from 12.04
directly to 16.04.
--
Slávek
while i'm here -- there was talk that there
was something wrong with
16.04 and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation
demonstrates, i'm not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and going
only to 14.04 means i get to do this all over again in two years. so
-- have the issues with 16.04 been ironed out, or is it still to be
avoided?
Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading
from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which Ubuntu
is based anyway?
Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble
to a minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first. 
12:42 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Wednesday 26 July 2017 20:05:07 Felix Miata wrote:
dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400):
A MATURE kde4? Thats an oxymoron from where I sit, and fully explains why
I've been running TDE for a couple years now.
while i'm here -- there was talk that there
was something wrong with
16.04 and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation
demonstrates, i'm not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and
going only to 14.04 means i get to do this all over again in two
years. so -- have the issues with 16.04 been ironed out, or is it
still to be avoided?
Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading
from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base
on which Ubuntu
is based anyway?
Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble
to a minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
1:06 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
Gene Heskett composed on 2017-07-26 20:42 (UTC-0400):
Felix Miata wrote:
> Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't
about KDE users upgrading
> from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
A MATURE kde4? Thats an oxymoron from where I sit, and
fully explains why
I've been running TDE for a couple years now.
Sure, relative to each other. 14.04 had 4.11, 16.04 5.5. Neither has or had
anything to do with TDE basides ancient ancestry. Both 4 and 5 were and are
programmer playtoys made for the adventurous, not for people who need to get
work done.
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
1:17 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| On Thursday 27 of July 2017 02:05:07 Felix Miata wrote:
| > dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400):
| > > while i'm here -- there was talk that there was something wrong with
| > > 16.04 and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation
| > > demonstrates, i'm not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and
| > > going only to 14.04 means i get to do this all over again in two
| > > years. so -- have the issues with 16.04 been ironed out, or is it
| > > still to be avoided?
| >
| > Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading
| > from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself?
| >
| > What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which Ubuntu
| > is based anyway?
| >
| > Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble
| > to a minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first.
|
| On my test machine, I have encountered substantial problems when
| updating 14.04 => 16.04. The network was not running, NIS was not
| working ... it was not good. The only function I've found is to update
| through all the versions in between 14.04 => 14.10 => 15.04 => 15.10 =>
| 16.04.
|
| It was terrible, but otherwise I did not have a properly functioning
| system. Therefore I definitely do not recommend updating from 12.04
| directly to 16.04.
Thanks very much. 14.04 it is, then!
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
1:18 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Thursday 27 of July 2017 02:26:57 dep wrote:
| What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian
base on which
| Ubuntu is based anyway?
in my case, the fact that i'm using it, and unless i'm much mistaken (a
distinct possibility, maybe a probability), changing sources to debian
and giving it the dist-upgrade command would produce surprises of a
kind i'm hoping to avoid.
I tested the upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 to Debian 7.x (Wheezy) => it was
complicated and the result was not good. Likewise, upgrade from Ubuntu
12.04 to Debian 8.x (Jessie) => problems were less, but the result was
also not good. There were still some Ubuntu configuration artefacts that
caused problems.
--
Slávek
1:41 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| On Thursday 27 of July 2017 02:26:57 dep wrote:
| > | What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which
| > | Ubuntu is based anyway?
| >
| > in my case, the fact that i'm using it, and unless i'm much mistaken
| > (a distinct possibility, maybe a probability), changing sources to
| > debian and giving it the dist-upgrade command would produce surprises
| > of a kind i'm hoping to avoid.
|
| I tested the upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 to Debian 7.x (Wheezy) => it was
| complicated and the result was not good. Likewise, upgrade from Ubuntu
| 12.04 to Debian 8.x (Jessie) => problems were less, but the result was
| also not good. There were still some Ubuntu configuration artefacts that
| caused problems.
Being fundamentally lazy, that's reason enough for me to stick with Ubuntu,
at least for now.
Many thanks.
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
1:46 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
Slávek Banko composed on 2017-07-27 03:18 (UTC+0200):
I tested the upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 to Debian 7.x
(Wheezy) => it was
complicated and the result was not good. Likewise, upgrade from Ubuntu
12.04 to Debian 8.x (Jessie) => problems were less, but the result was
also not good. There were still some Ubuntu configuration artefacts that
caused problems.
I would never have tried or suggested either, because of a fundamental
difference to Debian, Ubuntu's upstart init system in 12.04, which remained
until 15.04.
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
30 Jul
30 Jul
2:32 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| I always strictly avoided the Ubuntu tool because one of the steps it
| performs is to disable all external apt sources. But this step is a very
| good reason for causing conflicts during the dist-upgrade.
|
| Instead, I use the classic Debian way == change the distribution name in
| all apt sources lists and then the common procedure:
|
| apt-get udpate
| apt-get upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get dist-upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get autoremove
well, i'm about ready to push the button on this and before doing so (in
hope of avoiding irrational and panicked "what did i do wrong" posts to
the list!) i thought i'd post the contents of my /etc/apt/sources.list
file, in case i'm missing something obvious here it is:
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
# deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party
## developers who want to ship their latest software.
deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main
## Trinity Desktop Environment
deb http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-r14.0.0/ubuntu
trusty main
deb-src http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-r14.0.0/ubuntu
trusty main
deb
http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-builddeps-r14.0.0/ubun…
trusty main
deb-src
http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-builddeps-r14.0.0/ubun…
trusty main
## DVD styler
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/dvdstyler-maintainers/ppa/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dvdstyler-maintainers/ppa/ubuntu trusty
main
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib
deb-src http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib
have i anything here obviously wrong?
thanks in advance to anyone who looks it over.
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
5:01 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Sunday 30 of July 2017 16:32:16 dep wrote:
said Slávek Banko:
| I always strictly avoided the Ubuntu tool because one of the steps it
| performs is to disable all external apt sources. But this step is a very
| good reason for causing conflicts during the dist-upgrade.
|
| Instead, I use the classic Debian way == change the distribution name in
| all apt sources lists and then the common procedure:
|
| apt-get udpate
| apt-get upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get dist-upgrade
| apt-get clean
| apt-get autoremove
well, i'm about ready to push the button on this and before doing so (in
hope of avoiding irrational and panicked "what did i do wrong" posts to
the list!) i thought i'd post the contents of my /etc/apt/sources.list
file, in case i'm missing something obvious here it is:
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
# deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party
## developers who want to ship their latest software.
deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main
## Trinity Desktop Environment
deb http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-r14.0.0/ubuntu
trusty main
deb-src http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-r14.0.0/ubuntu
trusty main
deb
http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-builddeps-r14.0.0/ubun
tu trusty main
deb-src
http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-builddeps-r14.0.0/ubun
tu trusty main
## DVD styler
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/dvdstyler-maintainers/ppa/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dvdstyler-maintainers/ppa/ubuntu trusty
main
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib
deb-src http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib
have i anything here obviously wrong?
thanks in advance to anyone who looks it over.
At first glance it seems to be all right.
Cheers
--
Slávek
5:15 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| At first glance it seems to be all right.
many thanks. one thing i wondered about, i realized after i sent the
original note, was the trinity repository to which it points. i copied it
from the trinity site, and it points to 14.0.0. the current release is,
what, 14.04, right? should i change that or will it automagically give me
the latest?
thanks again.
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
5:26 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
On Sunday 30 of July 2017 19:15:33 dep wrote:
said Slávek Banko:
| At first glance it seems to be all right.
many thanks. one thing i wondered about, i realized after i sent the
original note, was the trinity repository to which it points. i copied it
from the trinity site, and it points to 14.0.0. the current release is,
what, 14.04, right? should i change that or will it automagically give me
the latest?
thanks again.
Yes, although the repositories are named 14.0.0, they are actually 14.0.x ==
now you get 14.0.4.
--
Slávek
5:40 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] trying to avoid rebuilding whole system
said Slávek Banko:
| On Sunday 30 of July 2017 19:15:33 dep wrote:
| > said Slávek Banko:
| > | At first glance it seems to be all right.
| >
| > many thanks. one thing i wondered about, i realized after i sent the
| > original note, was the trinity repository to which it points. i copied
| > it from the trinity site, and it points to 14.0.0. the current release
| > is, what, 14.04, right? should i change that or will it automagically
| > give me the latest?
| >
| > thanks again.
|
| Yes, although the repositories are named 14.0.0, they are actually
| 14.0.x == now you get 14.0.4.
Thank you.
--
dep
The shortest distance between you and playing great acoustic guitar:
the great new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson,
available at www.MarjorieThompson.com
2466
days inactive
2470
days old
17 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
deloptes -
dep -
Felix Miata -
Gene Heskett -
Slávek Banko