14 Feb
2011
14 Feb
'11
7:44 p.m.
Tim, All
Looks like the Trinity code is invalid:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
14 Feb
14 Feb
9:08 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity code is Invalid and is rejected by gcc 4.5.2 (according to gcc.gnu.org)
On 02/14/2011 01:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tim, All
Looks like the Trinity code is invalid:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6
The discussion regarding the bug pretty interesting. The jury is still out on
whether this is a gcc issue or a trinity issue. There is no question that gcc
was changed and that this change means that trinity will not compile on the
new gcc. The open question is whether it is Trinty or gcc that needs to change
to fix the issue.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
10:53 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity code is Invalid and is rejected by gcc 4.5.2 (according to gcc.gnu.org)
Tim, All
Looks like the Trinity code is invalid:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Saw that. I'll be fixing SVN shortly.
Tim
15 Feb
15 Feb
1:13 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity code is Invalid and is rejected by gcc 4.5.2 (according to gcc.gnu.org)
On 02/14/2011 04:53 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
Thanks Tim,
You guys are great. I'll wait for the updates and then dive back in with gcc
4.5.2. The gcc bug was a neat issue. You can see how a simply change to bring
the g++ compiler into compliance with standards can reap havoc on existing code.
Surprisingly, I understood the issue (the details of which were way over my
head). But, the change to gcc in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764 resulting in gcc >= 4.5 not
accepting the existing class constructor made sense.
What? - Trinity building on the new gcc? Looks like we have us a modern day
desktop in the works :p
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Tim, All
Looks like the Trinity code is invalid:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Saw that. I'll be fixing SVN shortly.
Tim
4829
days inactive
4830
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
David C. Rankin -
Timothy Pearson