1 Dec
2010
1 Dec
'10
9:01 a.m.
Hello, list!
Question is in subj of the message.
Because as for me all (i mean, all, not only kde4) qt4 apps are much
slower then they were on qt3. So, what are advantages of migration?
--
Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup.
With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department
3 Dec
3 Dec
12:14 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] What for is QT4 migration?
From the little I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were not
more heavyweight themselves. Or at least that's what I've heard around the
time it was introduced. There are also other advantages like better
rendering when resizing windows and multithreaded performance.
I guess the only way to know for sure if memory usage is lower, and
performance is better, is to port parts of the code and test. I can't seem
to find benchmarks but KDE 4 now is quite slimmer than what it used to be,
even though it still uses more memory than KDE 3/Trinity.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hello, list!
Question is in subj of the message.
Because as for me all (i mean, all, not only kde4) qt4 apps are much
slower then they were on qt3. So, what are advantages of migration?
Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup.
With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department
5 Dec
5 Dec
10:11 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] What for is QT4 migration?
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Tiago Marques wrote:
So one question comes to mind: why qt4 apps with the same or less
end-user functional as qt3-apps consume much more resources then, again,
qt3-ones in case of kde4?
--
Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup.
With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department
From the little
I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were not
more heavyweight
themselves. 
8:08 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] What for is QT4 migration?
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Tiago
Marques wrote:
So one question comes to mind: why qt4 apps with the
same or less
end-user functional as qt3-apps consume much more resources then, again,
qt3-ones in case of kde4?
Qt4 seems to encourage sloppy (slow/memory intensive) coding for some
reason. Also, Qt4 lacks many functions that Qt3 offered, leaving
programmers to try to re-implement them. I have found that many of these
re-implementations are less efficient than the original internal Qt3 code
was, partially due to unexposed internal Qt variables.
Just my $0.02.
Tim
From the
little I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were
not
more heavyweight themselves.
8:13 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] What for is QT4 migration?
Interesting. Going forward, is it then benefical to stic to Qt3 then?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net
wrote:
On Fri, Dec
03, 2010 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Tiago Marques wrote:
So one question comes to mind: why qt4 apps with the
same or less
end-user functional as qt3-apps consume much more resources then, again,
qt3-ones in case of kde4?
Qt4 seems to encourage sloppy (slow/memory intensive) coding for some
reason. Also, Qt4 lacks many functions that Qt3 offered, leaving
programmers to try to re-implement them. I have found that many of these
re-implementations are less efficient than the original internal Qt3 code
was, partially due to unexposed internal Qt variables.
Just my $0.02.
Tim
From the
little I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were
not
more heavyweight themselves.
4894
days inactive
4898
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Mikle Krutov -
Tiago Marques -
Timothy Pearson