Hi Trinity users!
I've recently switched from KDE 3.5.10 (Debian Lenny) to KDE 4.4.5 (Debian Squeeze) and was really disappointed by KDE 4 slowlyness (qt4/nvidia driver issue...?). This morning I decided to give a try to Trinity 3.5.12 and I feel... better!
Things are almost perfect, fast, etc. just like it was in KDE 3.5.10, even KDE 4 applications appears to run fine (and so, much faster than under KDE 4 itself)
However, I wonder if Amarok2 system tray icon is compatible with the KDE3/Trinity system? I've tried various KDE 4 apps that uses system tray icons, and they were ok with that (klipper 4.4.5 for example).
Have you got an answer...? Thanks!
Nicolas.
Hi Trinity users!
I've recently switched from KDE 3.5.10 (Debian Lenny) to KDE 4.4.5 (Debian Squeeze) and was really disappointed by KDE 4 slowlyness (qt4/nvidia driver issue...?). This morning I decided to give a try to Trinity 3.5.12 and I feel... better!
Things are almost perfect, fast, etc. just like it was in KDE 3.5.10, even KDE 4 applications appears to run fine (and so, much faster than under KDE 4 itself)
However, I wonder if Amarok2 system tray icon is compatible with the KDE3/Trinity system? I've tried various KDE 4 apps that uses system tray icons, and they were ok with that (klipper 4.4.5 for example).
Have you got an answer...? Thanks!
Nicolas.
It should be. I would be surprised if Trinity was doing something incorrectly in this area, as it complies with the relevant Free Desktop specifications for system tray icons. Maybe Amarok2 does not provide a true system tray icon per the Free Desktop specs?
Has anyone else on this list tried Amarok2?
Thanks!
Tim
Le 16/09/2010 20:02, Timothy Pearson a écrit :
Hi Trinity users!
I've recently switched from KDE 3.5.10 (Debian Lenny) to KDE 4.4.5 (Debian Squeeze) and was really disappointed by KDE 4 slowlyness (qt4/nvidia driver issue...?). This morning I decided to give a try to Trinity 3.5.12 and I feel... better!
Things are almost perfect, fast, etc. just like it was in KDE 3.5.10, even KDE 4 applications appears to run fine (and so, much faster than under KDE 4 itself)
However, I wonder if Amarok2 system tray icon is compatible with the KDE3/Trinity system? I've tried various KDE 4 apps that uses system tray icons, and they were ok with that (klipper 4.4.5 for example).
Have you got an answer...? Thanks!
Nicolas.
It should be. I would be surprised if Trinity was doing something incorrectly in this area, as it complies with the relevant Free Desktop specifications for system tray icons. Maybe Amarok2 does not provide a true system tray icon per the Free Desktop specs?
Has anyone else on this list tried Amarok2?
Thanks!
Tim
Hi Tim,
I did some tests a few minutes ago.
I launched Amarok2 (2.3.0) over an "ssh -X dist-pc" connection to another computer on my local network (note that ~/ hasn't the same content compared to localhost's one). The distant Amarok2 instance showed a system tray icon, not the good one (it contains a question mark, see attachment: the icon on the right), but it responded ok to both right & left clicks, etc.
I'm curious: I did the same over an "ssh -X localhost" (my amarok2 is 2.3.1), the problem is still the same: no icon.
I'm curious again: tested Amarok2 for another user (say "user2") over "ssh -X user2@localhost": BINGO! The "amarok2-systray-question-mark-icon" appeared! So my computer, at least, can display a functional systray icon for Amarok2!
I'm more curious: logged into X using user2 account (deleted /home/user2/.[^.]* before each X login in order to run from scratch) - systray icon present under gnome - systray icon NOT present under Trinity
All of these tests show to me that systray icon: - doesn't work for my usual account at all under Trinity nor through "ssh -X", - works for new accounts under Trinity only through "ssh -X", Weird!
I get more confused now as I initially thought that my ~/.trinity was faulty.
Thanks for reading all of this! Nicolas
PS: Of course this isn't a big issue, but I used to play a lot with Amarok systray icon.